by Maurice Merleau-Ponty ‧ RELEASE DATE: Aug. 1, 1969
A group of essays written in 1946 by a French philosopher too little known here. The historical impetus is the Cold War and a refusal to be either Communist or anti-Communist. There are no explicit polemics with Sartre or the French Communist Party, and the book requires no background in such matters. The topical points of departure include Darkness At Noon, the Moscow Trials, Trotsky's thought in exile, the Marxist theory of the proletariat. What Merleau-Ponty makes of them is brilliant. By comparison, Camus seems shallow and the Eastern European Marxist humanists sophomoric. Merleau-Ponty manages to give full weight to ambiguity and tragedy without falling into idealist or merely literary traps. (The style is literary as opposed to philosophical.) His grasp of such battered issues as the errors of abstract humanism and the individual's relation to history reanimates them. False alternatives are not only exposed but transcended: innocence/guilt, freedom/necessity, religiosity/amorality, subjectivity/materialism--and, of course, Koestler's Commissar and Yogi. For students of political theory the essays are mandatory; for a wider politically-minded audience they are demanding but enormously rewarding.
Pub Date: Aug. 1, 1969
ISBN: N/A
Page Count: -
Publisher: Beacon
Review Posted Online: N/A
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 1969
Categories: NONFICTION
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hey there, book lover.
We’re glad you found a book that interests you!
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Don’t fret. We’ll find you.