ELECTABLE

A Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News examines why the U.S. still has not elected a woman president.

As Vitali, who followed the 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns across the country, points out, 2020 produced the most female presidential candidates—all Democrats—in American history. The six women who ran were “qualified, competent lawmakers with heavy policy portfolios,” and they all “attracted top staff and notched key endorsements.” Yet no woman was selected to face incumbent Donald Trump. The author argues that women—even those like then-Sen. Kamala Harris—did not have the name recognition of male candidates like former Vice President Joe Biden. They also had to work far harder than male candidates to build a “national campaign infrastructure and a national donor base to pay for it.” Vitali suggests that because the experiences of women are not discussed enough, or dismissed as irrelevant, voters who fail to do the proper research (a discouragingly large section of eligible voters) may feel like women are agenda-driven unknowns unable to take on important issues. In turn, this makes them appear unable to offer the same “reassurance” that a (White) man could. This was especially significant at a time when fear levels—largely stoked by Trump and his enablers and followers, abetted by Fox News—caused voters to avoid anything remotely uncertain. On the positive side, Vitali shows that because Joe Biden has made it a priority to elevate women like Kamala Harris to high-level government posts, he has helped bring much-needed visibility to women leaders in a way that even Hilary Clinton could not. This will help women continue to build voter credibility, making them not just viable, but electable candidates. In this hopeful and well-documented study, Vitali clearly shows the importance of a truly level playing field. “It’s the job of the candidates to run,” she writes, “but it’s on us to ensure the track is uniformly flat for all of them.”

Intelligent and engaging political analysis.