Poignant and persuasive.
A military widow’s searing nonfiction account of her husband’s murder and the court-martial that acquitted his accused killer.
This debut began as a personal journal after Allen received notification that her spouse, Lt. Louis Allen, had been killed on June 8, 2005, four days after arriving in Iraq. His base assignment at one of Saddam Hussein’s former Tikrit palaces was considered safer than most. His old friend and base commander, Capt. Phillip Esposito, had recruited him specifically to fix supply problems attributed to Staff Sgt. Alberto Martinez, with whom Esposito had an escalating dispute. As Allen and Esposito sat indoors playing a board game, an explosion tore through a window, killing them both. An investigation revealed that it wasn’t an enemy attack but a homicide: a wire-detonated claymore mine had propelled hundreds of ball bearings through the window. (Claymores are labeled “Front Toward Enemy,” hence the book’s title.) Martinez, who had openly threatened Esposito, had access to claymores, and was seen outside the blast site shortly afterward, was charged with murder. The military justice system plodded through procedural delays, and the defense got Martinez’s interrogation suppressed. At trial, three years later, the defense portrayed a bungled investigation that ignored other suspects, and Martinez was found not guilty. True-crime aficionados will appreciate Allen’s blow-by-blow chronicle of the trial. General readers, though, might find it tedious; however, it sets the stage for the author’s indignation, vindicated after the trial by her discovery of secretly suppressed evidence. Allen is on a mission to expose this injustice in this book, and she fights unsparingly and convincingly against institutional inertia and outright deceit. Beyond its indictment of a flawed military justice system, the book’s strongest suit is Allen’s intimate memoir of the pain and suffering borne by a widow and four young children as they rebuilt their lives. Its sentence fragments reinforce its diaristic quality and evoke halting progress (“Jeremy. Our baby. One and a half-years old and such a little maniac”). Its characterizations and pacing are also effective. Allen never shrinks from honest appraisal, however raw, even of her own conflicting urges and perceived shortcomings. She writes unevenly at times, but at her best, she translates visceral emotions to concrete language with uncommon power and clarity.
Poignant and persuasive.Pub Date: Feb. 1, 2011
ISBN: 978-1-60-037829-4
Page Count: 274
Publisher: Morgan James Publishing
Review Posted Online: Oct. 30, 2015
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
A tour-de-force of true crime reportage.
Godfrey reconstructs a horrific murder with a vividness found in the finest fiction, without ever sacrificing journalistic integrity.
The novel The Torn Skirt (2002) showed how well the author could capture the roiling inner life of a teenager. She brings that sensibility to bear in this account of the 1997 murder of a 14-year-old girl in British Columbia, a crime for which seven teenage girls and one boy were charged. While there’s no more over-tilled literary soil than that of the shocking murder in a small town, Godfrey manages to portray working-class View Royal in a fresh manner. The victim, Reena Virk, was a problematic kid. Rebelling against her Indian parents’ strict religiosity, she desperately mimicked the wannabe gangsta mannerisms of her female schoolmates, who repaid her idolization by ignoring her. The circumstances leading up to the murder seem completely trivial: a stolen address book, a crush on the wrong guy. But popular girls like Josephine and Kelly had created a vast, imaginary world (mostly stolen from mafia movies and hip-hop) in which they were wildly desired and feared. In this overheated milieu, reality was only a distant memory, and everything was allowed. The murder and cover-up are chilling. Godfrey parcels out details piecemeal in the words of the teens who took part or simply watched. None of them seemed to quite comprehend what was going on, why it happened or even—in a few cases—what the big deal was. The tone veers close to melodrama, but in this context it works, since the author is telling the story from the inside out, trying to approximate the relentlessly self-dramatizing world these kids inhabited. Given most readers’ preference for easily explained and neatly concluded crime narratives, Godfrey’s resolute refusal to impose false order on the chaos of a murder spawned by rumors and lies is commendable.
A tour-de-force of true crime reportage.Pub Date: Oct. 1, 2005
ISBN: 0-7432-1091-3
Page Count: 368
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Review Posted Online: June 24, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 2005
BOOK REVIEW
IN THE NEWS
BOOK TO SCREEN
BOOK TO SCREEN
The author brings the case for judicial redress before the court of public opinion.
A former Justice Department lawyer, who now devotes her private practice to federal appeals, dissects some of the most politically contentious prosecutions of the last 15 years.
Powell assembles a stunning argument for the old adage, “nothing succeeds like failure,” as she traces the careers of a group of prosecutors who were part of the Enron Task Force. The Supreme Court overturned their most dramatic court victories, and some were even accused of systematic prosecutorial misconduct. Yet former task force members such as Kathryn Ruemmler, Matthew Friedrich and Andrew Weissman continued to climb upward through the ranks and currently hold high positions in the Justice Department, FBI and even the White House. Powell took up the appeal of a Merrill Lynch employee who was convicted in one of the subsidiary Enron cases, fighting for six years to clear his name. The pattern of abuse she found was repeated in other cases brought by the task force. Prosecutors of the accounting firm Arthur Andersen pieced together parts of different statutes to concoct a crime and eliminated criminal intent from the jury instructions, which required the Supreme Court to reverse the Andersen conviction 9-0; the company was forcibly closed with the loss of 85,000 jobs. In the corruption trial of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, a key witness was intimidated into presenting false testimony, and as in the Merrill Lynch case, the prosecutors concealed exculpatory evidence from the defense, a violation of due process under the Supreme court’s 1963 Brady v. Maryland decision. Stevens’ conviction, which led to a narrow loss in his 2008 re-election campaign and impacted the majority makeup of the Senate, seems to have been the straw that broke the camel's back; the presiding judge appointed a special prosecutor to investigate abuses. Confronted with the need to clean house as he came into office, writes Powell, Attorney General Eric Holder has yet to take action.
The author brings the case for judicial redress before the court of public opinion.Pub Date: May 1, 2014
ISBN: 978-1-61254-149-5
Page Count: 456
Publisher: Brown Books
Review Posted Online: April 29, 2014
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2014
© Copyright 2024 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
bookshelf
