Revisionist history, albeit inconclusive, that’s interesting, well-made, and should attract much attention.
An examination, sure to provoke controversy, of Christianity’s most powerful symbol.
Does wood from the cross on which Christ was crucified exist in the world today? Many parishioners of Rome’s Santa Croce in Gerusalemme church would say yes. In its recesses, write Swiss papyrologist Thiede and English journalist d’Ancona (Eyewitness to Jesus, 1996), is housed a 25.3-by-14-centimeter section of the titulus, or headboard, that, three of the four Gospels aver, bore mocking words in three languages stating “This is the king of the Jews.” Examining the board without the benefit of dendrochronological and palynological tests, which they urge be undertaken, and arguing instead from linguistic and scriptural evidence, Thiede and d’Ancona assert their belief that the Santa Croce titulus dates from the time of Christ even though other scholars have held it to be a forgery. Their argument, they acknowledge, is in no way definitive, but it at least restores the fragment of wood “to its rightful place in the spectrum of historical probability”—a worthy enough goal given the importance that Christian scholarship places on history and chronology. Of more interest to general readers of biblical and religious history is the authors’ survey of the legend of the cross, bits and pieces of which were traded and fought over even in antiquity, and much of which, it is said, disappeared when the Frankish army that carried the cross as a talisman lost it in battle against the Sultan Saladin. Traditional scholarship holds that the cross itself became a symbol of Christianity only after the Roman emperor Constantine adopted it as his standard, but Thiede and d’Ancona counter, convincingly, that this view is based on questionable evidence and that Constantine (and his mother Helena) simply rediscovered a symbol already widely used by early Christians.
Revisionist history, albeit inconclusive, that’s interesting, well-made, and should attract much attention.Pub Date: March 1, 2001
ISBN: 0-312-29424-7
Page Count: 205
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2002
If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.
The authors have created a sort of anti-Book of Virtues in this encyclopedic compendium of the ways and means of power.
Everyone wants power and everyone is in a constant duplicitous game to gain more power at the expense of others, according to Greene, a screenwriter and former editor at Esquire (Elffers, a book packager, designed the volume, with its attractive marginalia). We live today as courtiers once did in royal courts: we must appear civil while attempting to crush all those around us. This power game can be played well or poorly, and in these 48 laws culled from the history and wisdom of the world’s greatest power players are the rules that must be followed to win. These laws boil down to being as ruthless, selfish, manipulative, and deceitful as possible. Each law, however, gets its own chapter: “Conceal Your Intentions,” “Always Say Less Than Necessary,” “Pose as a Friend, Work as a Spy,” and so on. Each chapter is conveniently broken down into sections on what happened to those who transgressed or observed the particular law, the key elements in this law, and ways to defensively reverse this law when it’s used against you. Quotations in the margins amplify the lesson being taught. While compelling in the way an auto accident might be, the book is simply nonsense. Rules often contradict each other. We are told, for instance, to “be conspicuous at all cost,” then told to “behave like others.” More seriously, Greene never really defines “power,” and he merely asserts, rather than offers evidence for, the Hobbesian world of all against all in which he insists we live. The world may be like this at times, but often it isn’t. To ask why this is so would be a far more useful project.
If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.Pub Date: Sept. 1, 1998
ISBN: 0-670-88146-5
Page Count: 430
Publisher: Viking
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 1998
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
This a book of earlier, philosophical essays concerned with the essential "absurdity" of life and the concept that- to overcome the strong tendency to suicide in every thoughtful man-one must accept life on its own terms with its values of revolt, liberty and passion. A dreary thesis- derived from and distorting the beliefs of the founders of existentialism, Jaspers, Heldegger and Kierkegaard, etc., the point of view seems peculiarly outmoded. It is based on the experience of war and the resistance, liberally laced with Andre Gide's excessive intellectualism. The younger existentialists such as Sartre and Camus, with their gift for the terse novel or intense drama, seem to have omitted from their philosophy all the deep religiosity which permeates the work of the great existentialist thinkers. This contributes to a basic lack of vitality in themselves, in these essays, and ten years after the war Camus seems unaware that the life force has healed old wounds... Largely for avant garde aesthetes and his special coterie.
Pub Date: Sept. 26, 1955
ISBN: 0679733736
Page Count: 228
Publisher: Knopf
Review Posted Online: Sept. 19, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1955
© Copyright 2024 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
bookshelf
