TERMS OF RESPECT

Proceed with caution.

Eisgruber, a constitutional law scholar and the president of Princeton University, weighs in on the challenges to free speech on college campuses. Drawing on his knowledge and experience, he argues that free speech is not free for all. We need, he argues, “political processes and social virtues that enable reason to prevail in public discussion.” “Good counsels,” he writes, should “prevail over evil….The power of reason [should] govern human affairs.” Eisgruber therefore proposes a way of both enabling and regulating speech. He uses words such as “politeness,” “civility,” and “professional standards.” Academic freedom, he claims, needs rules of engagement. The current generation of undergraduates needs an education in ethical behavior and in consensus building. We need to be weaned off cancel culture. He admits that we cannot say things we used to say. And yet, those limitations do not compromise free speech. “Free speech does not entitle people to say whatever they please without bearing responsibility for it. On the contrary, the purposes of free speech include enabling discussions about what is true and just.” Eisgruber retells a series of campus encounters, both at Princeton and elsewhere, that illustrate the dangers of uncivil discourse and cancellation. Undergraduates, today, are angry about a lot of things. They communicate differently from previous generations. They often live on the intersection of what the authors of Gen Z, Explained call “moral panic and technological advancement.” In the end, this book is less about free speech than about cultivating a moral character and a sense of civic, and civil, responsibility. It is a book of calm reflection trying to address an inflammatory age. In his tone, his arguments, and his narrative evenhandedness, Eisgruber comes off as the adult in the room.

A reasoned, quiet argument for civil discourse in an unreasonable, loud time.