TOMORROW SEX WILL BE GOOD AGAIN

As this slim yet philosophically dense volume suggests, consent doesn't guarantee enjoyable sex—and may in fact inhibit it.

British academic Angel considers the relatively new concept that sexual interaction should rely on a man asking for, and a woman granting, permission for each sequential act involved. (For the purposes of this book, she focuses on cis men and women: “The particular quandaries affecting trans people’s experience of sex, as well as those in same-sex relationships will, I hope, find some resonance and recognition in the dynamics I explore here, but the fine-grained texture of those quandaries are not mine to explore, and others are better placed to be doing (and to have done) that vital work.”) In chapters about consent and vulnerability, the author makes the point that “we do not always know what we want” and that clearly stating your desires does nothing to prevent “miserable, unpleasant, humiliating” sex. The book's ironic title—borrowed from a 1976 essay by French philosopher Michel Foucault that criticized contemporary “sexual liberationists”—suggests that positive sexual interactions cannot be willed into existence. Rather, they depend on “conversation, mutual exploration, curiosity, uncertainty—all things, as it happens, that are stigmatized within traditional masculinity.” Angel argues that sexual relationships don't have much to do with the conscious and the verbal but, especially for women, with what goes on beneath the surface of consciousness. The one certainty she returns to repeatedly is that “we shouldn't have to know ourselves in order to be safe from violence.” Because she builds her case on her own observations and experiences more than scholarly research, some readers may be skeptical about her authority while others will find the logical arguments that she makes convincing. Some might also wish for even more personal stories to be woven into what is generally a cerebral and abstract book. Still, Angel raises intriguing questions about commonly accepted assumptions, and she offers reassurance to female readers.

A provocative counterargument to recent feminist dogma.