RAFFERTY'S LAST CASE

St. Paul shamus Shadwell Rafferty’s ninth collaboration with Sherlock Holmes proves to be his last.

Collaboration may not be the best word, for Holmes and Dr. Watson are pulled away from Chicago in January 1928 by a report from George Washington Thomas, Rafferty’s longtime partner and friend, that the 85-year-old investigator has been fatally stabbed in the back, presumably by someone involved in the death of Daniel St. Aubin, which he had been investigating. Society blackmailer St. Aubin had put the touch on so many victims that the best list of suspects in his murder may be the Twin Cities telephone directory. In a letter delivered posthumously to his long-estranged mother, however, St. Aubin identified five likely culprits in the event of his demise: St. Paul Chief of Detectives Jackson Grimshaw, gay poet/mystery novelist Bertram Abbey, Monsignor Pierre Denis of St. Paul Cathedral, St. Paul Mayor Richard O’Donnell, and his chief aide and fixer, Montgomery Meeks. Once she learns that he’s in town, Muriel St. Aubin wants Holmes to find out who killed her son. Although her unwillingness to believe anything bad of Danny and her extreme reticence about both his activities and her own make her a less than ideal client, Holmes pursues the case through the simple expedient of uncovering and retracing Rafferty’s steps, a procedure as logical as it is uninspired. Cutting back and forth between two investigations, Rafferty’s and Holmes’, that are not so much parallel as congruent, Millett follows the trail through a series of variously juicy revelations to the least interesting candidate for the role of murderer.

Though he’s upstaged as usual by Rafferty, Millett’s Holmes is appealingly courteous, suave, and even a bit sarcastic.