LET THE LORD SORT THEM

The evolution of capital punishment in America.

Austin-based journalist Chammah, a staff writer for the Marshall Project, effectively splits his report between a history of the death penalty and its incremental downfall in recent decades. He focuses predominantly on Texas, an ultraconservative state at the epicenter of the debate, and examines how public opinion has shifted to embrace other punishments, such as life without parole. The author first charts the historical rise of executions from the early 1970s, corresponding with a dramatic rise in violent crime. In Texas, the political conversation has been focused on the types of crime that warrant it as well as consideration of a defendant’s “future dangerousness.” The state’s long history of “frontier justice” has meant that “of the roughly fifteen hundred executions that Americans have carried out since the 1970s, Texas has been responsible for more than five hundred.” Chammah profiles several key figures, including Elsa Alcala, a former assistant district attorney and judge on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; and Danalynn Recer, a lawyer and prominent death penalty opponent. In dramatic fashion, the author also interweaves details about high-profile capital crime cases. Among others, he thoroughly examines the executions of Karla Faye Tucker (1998) and Shaka Sankofa (2000), looking at the cases from multiple angles. Throughout, the author keenly probes critical perspectives on whether compassion is warranted for death row convicts or if the act of fitting the punishment with the crime is sufficient. “Both sides,” he writes, “need to downplay and amplify free will, only at different moments in their narratives.” With great conviction, Chammah presents an expansive portrait of the death penalty through the perspectives of opponents, defenders, families of the executed, and the sentenced themselves, illuminating a passionately debated issue with cleareyed impartiality. The author’s inclusion of so many legal cases detracts from the narrative but doesn't weaken its premise or impact.

A hard-hitting, meaningful, and debate-inspiring exposé on one of the darkest elements of the criminal justice system.