Kirkus Reviews QR Code
SPLATTERPUNKS II: Over the Edge by Paul M. -- Ed. Sammon

SPLATTERPUNKS II: Over the Edge

By

Pub Date: Sept. 1st, 1994
Publisher: Tor

A mosaic of viscera, excrement, sex, and degradation whirls before our eyes in this anthology of stories and essays that run the gamut from lame and pretentious to genuinely stunning. Sammon, a former film publicist turned literary schlockmeister (he edited Splatterpunks, 1990), introduces this volume with the boast, ""They're bad. They're back. They're women."" Yes, female authors and characters do feature heavily in this Splatpack, but stories like Sammon's own flaccid entry, ""Within You, Without You"" (in which a rock band sexually mutilates a female teenage groupie on video), and essays such as Martin Amis's self-serving, decade-old interview of filmmaker Brian DePalma (whose oeuvre includes the sexist classics Body Double and Dressed to Kill) serve as a curious counterpoint to the stated focus. Among the better entries are Gorman Bechard's ""Pig,"" a wickedly funny tale about an all-woman vigilante hit squad in 21st-century Los Angeles that simultaneously evokes Philip K. Dick and the frenetic violence of Japanese adult comics; Nancy A. Collins's ""Rant,"" a chilling glimpse into the mind of a deluded messiah; Anya Martin's ""Rockin' the Midnight Hour,"" which examines the connections between horror and rock; and ""Calling Dr. Satan,"" Jim Goad's interview with Anton LaVey, self-proclaimed ""Black Pope"" of the Church of Satan and author of The Satanic Bible. A genre that alternately craves and shuns acceptance, Splatterpunk is (for those not familiar with buzzwords used to pigeonhole literature) an amalgam of slasher films, brooding metal/Goth-inspired rock, and basic naughtiness disguised as nihilism; the editor describes it as ""a method. An attitude. A state of mind."" This exercise in combining incongruous media elements into one discordant whole could be the real cutting edge -- but Sammon dulls it in introductory passages whose smugness and hipster wannabe posturing frequently undermine the authors' contributions.