Did Colby get away with murder? You be the judge. Recommended.



A lawyer recounts a woman’s sensational murder trial and the implications of her insanity defense.

The title is the literary equivalent of click-bait, but this is a meticulous and well-written account of one of Ohio’s most infamous murders, second perhaps in notoriety only to the Sam Sheppard case. This is not a whodunit; Tabac’s debut book begins with this statement: “In 1965, Mariann Colby, an intelligent, attractive Shaker Heights housewife and mother, shot a nine-year-old neighbor boy to death.” The boy was the son of John Young Sr., with whom the obsessed Colby “was hopelessly in love.” According to one theory, she murdered his child in revenge because he rebuffed her advances. Young told the police after identifying his son in the morgue, “Mariann Colby did it, and I believe that it was me that she wanted to kill.” Colby would become “one of the state’s most infamous villains.” Her formidable defense attorney, Gerald Gold, considered Colby’s situation to be “an electric-chair case.” When his plea to prosecutors to make a deal that would spare her life was rejected (“All of the neighbors wanted to see Mariann Colby dead,” he said), he decided to mount an insanity defense. Tabac is a practicing attorney and an emeritus professor at Cleveland Marshall College of Law. He does an admirable job of laying out the facts of the case and writing accessibly about the insanity defense, from its historical roots to the risks it presented Gold. Though readers know from the get-go that Colby is the culprit, Tabac’s deft uses of foreshadowing (“Despite a shocking act of betrayal that she committed against” her son) hint at the case’s twists and turns and should heighten readers’ eagerness to see justice done and to discover what happens next. He advances the story through dramatically doled out revelations that make this book on par with the better episodes of NBC’s true-crime series Dateline. The jury is still out on the author’s practice of bolding the first paragraph of each chapter.

Did Colby get away with murder? You be the judge. Recommended.

Pub Date: April 8, 2018

ISBN: 978-1-60635-352-3

Page Count: 184

Publisher: The Kent State University Press

Review Posted Online: March 1, 2019

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet


"There's got to be something wrong with somebody who'd do a thing like that." This is Perry Edward Smith, talking about himself. "Deal me out, baby...I'm a normal." This is Richard Eugene Hickock, talking about himself. They're as sick a pair as Leopold and Loeb and together they killed a mother, a father, a pretty 17-year-old and her brother, none of whom they'd seen before, in cold blood. A couple of days before they had bought a 100 foot rope to garrote them—enough for ten people if necessary. This small pogrom took place in Holcomb, Kansas, a lonesome town on a flat, limitless landscape: a depot, a store, a cafe, two filling stations, 270 inhabitants. The natives refer to it as "out there." It occurred in 1959 and Capote has spent five years, almost all of the time which has since elapsed, in following up this crime which made no sense, had no motive, left few clues—just a footprint and a remembered conversation. Capote's alternating dossier Shifts from the victims, the Clutter family, to the boy who had loved Nancy Clutter, and her best friend, to the neighbors, and to the recently paroled perpetrators: Perry, with a stunted child's legs and a changeling's face, and Dick, who had one squinting eye but a "smile that works." They had been cellmates at the Kansas State Penitentiary where another prisoner had told them about the Clutters—he'd hired out once on Mr. Clutter's farm and thought that Mr. Clutter was perhaps rich. And this is the lead which finally broke the case after Perry and Dick had drifted down to Mexico, back to the midwest, been seen in Kansas City, and were finally picked up in Las Vegas. The last, even more terrible chapters, deal with their confessions, the law man who wanted to see them hanged, back to back, the trial begun in 1960, the post-ponements of the execution, and finally the walk to "The Corner" and Perry's soft-spoken words—"It would be meaningless to apologize for what I did. Even inappropriate. But I do. I apologize." It's a magnificent job—this American tragedy—with the incomparable Capote touches throughout. There may never have been a perfect crime, but if there ever has been a perfect reconstruction of one, surely this must be it.

Pub Date: Jan. 7, 1965

ISBN: 0375507906

Page Count: 343

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: Oct. 10, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1965

Did you like this book?

The author brings the case for judicial redress before the court of public opinion.



A former Justice Department lawyer, who now devotes her private practice to federal appeals, dissects some of the most politically contentious prosecutions of the last 15 years.

Powell assembles a stunning argument for the old adage, “nothing succeeds like failure,” as she traces the careers of a group of prosecutors who were part of the Enron Task Force. The Supreme Court overturned their most dramatic court victories, and some were even accused of systematic prosecutorial misconduct. Yet former task force members such as Kathryn Ruemmler, Matthew Friedrich and Andrew Weissman continued to climb upward through the ranks and currently hold high positions in the Justice Department, FBI and even the White House. Powell took up the appeal of a Merrill Lynch employee who was convicted in one of the subsidiary Enron cases, fighting for six years to clear his name. The pattern of abuse she found was repeated in other cases brought by the task force. Prosecutors of the accounting firm Arthur Andersen pieced together parts of different statutes to concoct a crime and eliminated criminal intent from the jury instructions, which required the Supreme Court to reverse the Andersen conviction 9-0; the company was forcibly closed with the loss of 85,000 jobs. In the corruption trial of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, a key witness was intimidated into presenting false testimony, and as in the Merrill Lynch case, the prosecutors concealed exculpatory evidence from the defense, a violation of due process under the Supreme court’s 1963 Brady v. Maryland decision. Stevens’ conviction, which led to a narrow loss in his 2008 re-election campaign and impacted the majority makeup of the Senate, seems to have been the straw that broke the camel's back; the presiding judge appointed a special prosecutor to investigate abuses. Confronted with the need to clean house as he came into office, writes Powell, Attorney General Eric Holder has yet to take action.

The author brings the case for judicial redress before the court of public opinion.

Pub Date: May 1, 2014

ISBN: 978-1-61254-149-5

Page Count: 456

Publisher: Brown Books

Review Posted Online: April 29, 2014

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2014

Did you like this book?