by Witold Rybczynski ‧ RELEASE DATE: Aug. 1, 1983
The author of a first-rate critique of the Appropriate Technology movement, Paper Heroes (1980), has taken the logical but hazardous step of challenging the larger antitechnology/antimodernism outlook: the fear of machines, the dread of mechanical labor, the horror of cultural decimation, the attempts to turn back the clock--and, at the beginning of the second section, the roots of those sentiments. The book is not as assured as its predecessor: Rybczynski is a professor of architecture (at McGill) and a practitioner of AT. Also, he tends more to hector here: to scorn the varied opponents of technology from a viewpoint barely distinguishable, sometimes, from that of the conservative futurologists. Nonetheless, he puts forth some vital, even head-turning, insights. The Luddites, he finds, were not mere ""machine-bashers""--their basic objection, and that of their labor-union successors, was to ""the use of machines to control."" Analogously, the Burmese and Cambodian rejections of modernism (in favor of self-reliance) reflected ""nothing more than the rejection of a hated colonial past."" Less convincingly, Rybczynski holds that the technological ""revolution need not result in worker displacement or alienation ""--although ""a lot will depend on the unions' ability to shift exclusive control of technology at least partly to their members."" His general conclusion, however--with specific reference to the American Indians' ""cultural crisis,"" but also weighing in the more complex Chinese and Iranian upheavals--would be hard today to rebut: ""the ghost dance of technological counterrevolution can never succeed."" More original--and more attuned to the unenthusiasts--is his succeeding attempt to demonstrate that the historical record (from Thoreau's use of nails to the cheap, ""cosy"" Airstream trailer) ""does not support the dour theory of technological inevitability"": technology can not only be controlled, and put to human purposes, it can also--he goes on to argue--be rejected (the samurai return-to-the-sword, poison gas, the zeppelin). ""Society determines the use of technology""; ""poverty has sometimes created the need to improvise ways of using technology"" (in India, China, Mexico, Poland); ""When a technology is viewed as a means to an end, its appropriate development is much more likely."" The tone is sometimes contemptuous (which may not hurt in the marketplace); the implications are positive--and huge.
Pub Date: Aug. 1, 1983
ISBN: N/A
Page Count: -
Publisher: Viking
Review Posted Online: N/A
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 1983
Categories: NONFICTION
© Copyright 2024 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hey there, book lover.
We’re glad you found a book that interests you!
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Don’t fret. We’ll find you.