I own more than three decks of Tarot cards—which I suppose makes me a collector—and my library contains at least one acknowledged classic book on the topic (Rachel Pollack’s Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom), which I suppose makes me an aficionado. I don’t use ‘em for divination, mind. I’m a mystic, sure, in the sense of awareness of the presence of the numinous and all that, but in a loosey-goosey Van Morrison kind of way—no guru, no method, no teacher.

So I’m not sold on the cards as a system of knowledge, no. But as a medium for artistic expression, it’s marvelous. The Major Arcana – those highly symbolic trump cards of the Tarot deck: the Fool, the Lovers, Death, Judgment, and so on – are for visual artists what “the standards” are for jazz players—a sturdy framework begging for the artist’s personal stamp, a readymade schema of icons and archetypes to tweak, to play with, to explore and interpret.

The Lowbrow Tarot: An Artistic Collaborative Effort in Honor of Tarot, edited by Aunia Kahn and Russell J. Moon, isn’t a working deck, of course. It’s a stunning, 144-page art book, released (appropriately enough) on Halloween, documenting a 2010 Los Angeles gallery show that brought together 23 top pop-surrealist artists, each interpreting one of the Major Arcana. In this collection, those themed works (mostly paintings, but including sculpture, charcoal drawings, and collage) are presented along with a representative sampling of each artist’s output, making The Lowbrow Tarot a sort of primer on the scene.

The lowbrow aesthetic—too ubiquitous now to be properly called a movement, and too wide-ranging to be properly called a school, popularized by painter/publisher Robert Williams and his journal Juxtapoz—emphasizes slick draftsmanship and a painterly figurative approach. Dalí and Magritte are the spiritual godfathers, but lowbrow bubbles with the influence and energy of mid-century junk culture: tattoo flash, comics and trading cards, commercial art, pulps and men’s magazines and cheesecake, all teeming with idiosyncratic symbols and obsessive detail. It’s a natural fit for the fraught and coded images of the Tarot.

Continue reading >


 

In fact, it may be a little too cozy. Some of the pictures lose their impact when seen in the context of the artist’s body of work. Laurie Lipton, for instance, interprets the Death card in charcoal and pencil as a Grim Reaper figure on a rearing skeleton horse. It’s a striking image on its own, all ghostly silver and gray—but skeleton imagery is so ubiquitous in Lipton’s other work that her take on Death looks, on reconsideration, a little too obvious, even lazy. She’s certainly not stretching significantly out of her artistic comfort zone.

In the same way, Brian Viveros’s interpretation of Strength as a young woman in a military helmet, swaddled in bandages, cigar in her crimson mouth, is initially arresting—until one sees the rest of his images; they all feature head-and-shoulders shots of young women, all smoking, all wearing some kind of headgear. Fourteen of Viveros’s paintings are reproduced in total, and they are, without exception, minute variations on a single theme—the same smudged lipstick and running mascara, the same bandages, the same red rose. The line between motif and fetish grows blurry, and thematic unity starts to look like a one-trick pony.

But if many of the pictures use elements that are by now overly familiar—steampunk gas masks, burlesque, kitsch religious iconography and Mexican folk-art stylings—there are some new and wondrous images here. Claudia Drake’s digital collages recall both Max Ernst and Edward Gorey in their air of subdued menace. Chris Mars—remembered by punks of a certain age as the drummer for The Replacements—paints eerily partitioned faces, suggesting the fragmentation of the psyche. Kris Kuksi assembles found elements into installations of riotous complexity; his interpretation of the Emperor surrounds a familiar image of Julius Caesar with sculptural bric-a-brac to an effect both grandiose and satirical.

Elsewhere, Molly Crabapple’s bold ink strokes give a vibrant, cartoony counterpoint to the glossy brushwork elsewhere. Christopher Conn Askew combines elements of tattoo art with classic poster design. And Jessica Joslin’s constructions of brass and bone combine the arts of jewelry-making and taxidermy to form imaginary artifacts as whimsical as they are macabre. What all of the artists share is a gift for unhinged, dreamy atmosphere, and that suits the intuitive aspects of the Tarot right down to the ground.

The lowbrow aesthetic has been developing since the late 1960s. With its love of trivia and play, it might never be considered a mature movement. But even so, surprisingly little has been written about it for all its track record and influence. That’s partly because so many of the artists come from outside the fine-arts establishment, and partly because—unlike previous artistic movements—the lowbrow scene has not itself produced a large body of criticism, theory, or manifestos.

Exhibits and portfolios like this—showcasing the broad spectrum of styles and techniques that fall under the umbrella heading of “lowbrow,” in a setting designed to allow the works to comment on each other—may help address that critical neglect. As a survey of the scene, The Lowbrow Tarot suggests that—loath though I am to attempt predictions—a major assessment of the movement is in the cards.

This review was written using a digital edition provided by the publisher.

Jack Feerick, Critic-at-Large for Popdose.com, is a Pisces with a bad moon rising, gifted with insight and a creative nature, but also prone to glibness, hackery, and a dangerous disregard for deadlines.