Next book

VEGETARIANISM

A HISTORY

A capable blend of dietary, religious, and political history that will please like-minded readers—but perhaps prompt...

Would the world be a better place if humans stopped eating things with faces? Indubitably, asserts English food-writer Spencer in this lively if sometimes debatable treatise.

Vegetarianism “is the diet which Gaia approves of and, if the human race are her infants, it is the only one by which she will suckle her brood,” writes Spencer (The Heretic’s Feast, not reviewed, etc.), taking for the purposes of argument the point of the view of the true-believer, extreme “vegetarian lobby”—a stance that he does not deliver from “the image of the morally earnest and the downright cranky.” More prosaically and less annoyingly, Spencer observes that as omnivores with a broad range of dietary choices, modern humans do not need meat in order to survive, except in extreme conditions where food plants cannot grow; a meatless diet is both healthier and more humane. Much of this attempts to provide that thesis with a pedigree, an effort in which Spencer is only partly successful. At the outset, for instance, he advances sketchy claims about what our hominid ancestors did and did not eat, ignoring or brushing aside such inconvenient evidence as the dentition pattern of ancestral and even modern humans, with incisors developed for the tearing of flesh, not the gnashing of grain. His examination of the role of vegetarianism in utopian thought is much more interesting. Plato’s ideal Republic, for instance, was meatless, and so is the heaven of the Jains and some Hindus and Buddhists. As for Hitler’s supposedly vegetarian regime, Spencer notes that though the Führer believed meat-eating was harmful, he did not force that particular view on his subjects and even outlawed vegetarian societies. Even so, after Hitler, vegetarian literature no longer claims that “war would be ended if only humanity abstained from meat and the slaughter of animals.”

A capable blend of dietary, religious, and political history that will please like-minded readers—but perhaps prompt contrarians to cook up a cheeseburger, rare.

Pub Date: Oct. 1, 2002

ISBN: 1-56858-238-2

Page Count: 400

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 2002

Categories:
Next book

THE ELEMENTS OF STYLE

50TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION

Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...

Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.

Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").

Pub Date: May 15, 1972

ISBN: 0205632645

Page Count: 105

Publisher: Macmillan

Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972

Categories:
Next book

NUTCRACKER

This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)

Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996

ISBN: 0-15-100227-4

Page Count: 136

Publisher: Harcourt

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996

Categories:
Close Quickview