A highly readable introduction to ancient archaeology and what it can teach us about the Bible.
What do the digs of the last three decades tell us about the Old Testament? In short, they tell us that most of the Hebrew Bible is bunk. The patriarchs—Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (along, presumably, with their matriarchal wives, Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah)—never existed. There’s no real evidence for the Exodus from Egypt, either. The evidence for the battle Joshua heroically fought with Jericho is “weak.” Digs in Jerusalem haven’t produced any evidence of a glorious reign of David. But archaeology does more than destruct biblical stories—it also offers new hypotheses. Just who were the Israelites if not the literal descendants of a literal guy named Abraham? Clues to their origins lay, the authors claim, in their earliest settlements, which have been excavated. The site of Izbet Sartah, for example, is laid out in an oval, indicating that the dwellers were pastoral. All this archaeological evidence, say Finkelstein (Archaeology/Tel Aviv Univ.) and Silberman (The Hidden Scrolls, 1994), adds up to a major revision of the literary history of the Bible. We can no longer believe that the so-called Book of J was written around the tenth century
Believers won’t much like this new look at the Bible through an archaeological lens, and scholars won’t find anything new, but everyone else will find Finkelstein and Silberman amiable guides.