A penetrating, street-level view of an infinitely depressing and growing problem.
Smack in the middle of the contentious immigration debate comes this angry indictment of the U.S. government’s inability to protect us from criminal aliens already within our border.
Holbrook, one of 600 federal officers nationwide charged with the apprehension and removal of aliens found guilty of felonies, resigned after four frustrating years, during which he actually poured more of these miscreants back onto the streets than he managed to deport, notwithstanding his willingness to lie, deceive and bend the rules. His tenure in the famously difficult New Orleans district, however, provided a trove of harrowing war stories, recounted here in hardboiled, high-energy, no-nonsense prose. Though never quite a rogue agent—no bribes or payoffs, no falsely claimed expenses—this self-described “master fabricator” wasn’t a choirboy either. Forced to operate in a netherworld between the government’s professed goal of deporting criminal aliens and foreign consulates’ distaste for accepting their own citizens who, they slyly claim, “learned their criminal ways in the United States,” he resorted to a series of questionable stratagems focused on ridding America of as many of these vicious criminals as possible. Frustrated by diplomatic dodges and the felons’ own manipulation of the system, Holbrook reserves his greatest disdain for the U.S. government, which he declares the biggest obstacle to stemming the criminal alien tide. Lamenting the notorious Zadvydas decision—which requires the release within six months of predatory aliens who cannot be returned to their home country—he rails against court and command mandates that hamstring agents in the field, against liberals whose misguided sympathies penalize those who play by the rules and against conservatives who talk a good game about protecting the citizenry from terror, but on whose watch the problem has only multiplied. Not unlike Dirty Harry, this dedicated, flawed agent earns our sympathy, if not our unqualified approval.
A penetrating, street-level view of an infinitely depressing and growing problem.Pub Date: Oct. 4, 2007
ISBN: 978-1-59523-041-6
Page Count: 256
Publisher: Sentinel
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 2007
If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.
The authors have created a sort of anti-Book of Virtues in this encyclopedic compendium of the ways and means of power.
Everyone wants power and everyone is in a constant duplicitous game to gain more power at the expense of others, according to Greene, a screenwriter and former editor at Esquire (Elffers, a book packager, designed the volume, with its attractive marginalia). We live today as courtiers once did in royal courts: we must appear civil while attempting to crush all those around us. This power game can be played well or poorly, and in these 48 laws culled from the history and wisdom of the world’s greatest power players are the rules that must be followed to win. These laws boil down to being as ruthless, selfish, manipulative, and deceitful as possible. Each law, however, gets its own chapter: “Conceal Your Intentions,” “Always Say Less Than Necessary,” “Pose as a Friend, Work as a Spy,” and so on. Each chapter is conveniently broken down into sections on what happened to those who transgressed or observed the particular law, the key elements in this law, and ways to defensively reverse this law when it’s used against you. Quotations in the margins amplify the lesson being taught. While compelling in the way an auto accident might be, the book is simply nonsense. Rules often contradict each other. We are told, for instance, to “be conspicuous at all cost,” then told to “behave like others.” More seriously, Greene never really defines “power,” and he merely asserts, rather than offers evidence for, the Hobbesian world of all against all in which he insists we live. The world may be like this at times, but often it isn’t. To ask why this is so would be a far more useful project.
If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.Pub Date: Sept. 1, 1998
ISBN: 0-670-88146-5
Page Count: 430
Publisher: Viking
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 1998
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...
A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.
Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016
ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6
Page Count: 248
Publisher: Random House
Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015
© Copyright 2024 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
bookshelf
