Next book

BITING THE HANDS THAT FEED US

HOW FEWER, SMARTER LAWS WOULD MAKE OUR FOOD SYSTEM MORE SUSTAINABLE

A provocative critique of current food policy from a libertarian perspective.

A call “to remove the shackles that bind America's food system in order to ensure a more sustainable food future.”

Food lawyer and scholar Linnekin (Food Law and Policy/George Mason Univ. and American Univ.), the founder of the nonprofit Keep Food Legal, contends that many local, state, and federal regulations ostensibly intended to protect consumers ignore environmental issues and operate to the benefit of large-scale food producers. In his view, much of the problem originates with bureaucratic overreach. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is responsible for creating a climate that favors corporate farms, and the author points out the sometimes-hidden agricultural subsidies, as in the case of school lunch programs. Linnekin offers the example of a conflict between the FDA and an award-winning Denver restaurateur who featured “Old World” meats containing “no artificial ingredients.” The chef purchased natural produce from local suppliers and used artisanal methods to prepare it, but regulators demanded that his sausages contain artificial preservatives. Rather than comply, he closed his restaurant. In the case of farmers, the author notes that while some of the regulations called for by the 2011 Food Safety Modernization Act are steps forward in guaranteeing food safety, many have been “anathema to sustainable farming.” He gives several examples, including “costly water testing for many crops that don't pose food-safety hazards,” as well as the banning of the use of wooden aging shelves by traditional cheesemakers. Local farmers markets have also found themselves in the FDA’s crosshairs for using ice blocks rather than costly electric refrigeration for the preservation of meat and poultry. Linnekin cites a 2010 Wall Street Journal article charging that such rules and regulations were “not the first time big business has leveraged government to weigh down smaller competitors,” a statement with which the passionate author agrees.

A provocative critique of current food policy from a libertarian perspective.

Pub Date: Sept. 15, 2016

ISBN: 978-1-61091-675-2

Page Count: 224

Publisher: Island Press

Review Posted Online: Sept. 18, 2017

Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 2016

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 55


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


Google Rating

  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating

  • Kirkus Reviews'
    Best Books Of 2016


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • Pulitzer Prize Finalist

Next book

WHEN BREATH BECOMES AIR

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 55


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


Google Rating

  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating

  • Kirkus Reviews'
    Best Books Of 2016


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • Pulitzer Prize Finalist

A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.

Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.

Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016

ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6

Page Count: 248

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015

Close Quickview