Next book

THE COUPLE WHO BECAME EACH OTHER

AND OTHER TALES OF HEALING FROM A MASTER HYPNOTHERAPIST

Freely reconstructed case histories from a Seattle hypnotherapist eager to show what he believes is the remarkable healing power of the unconscious mind. Calof, a student of Eastern philosophy, uses hypnosis as a form of communication. Simply stated, when a client comes to him with a problem, he induces a trance, speaks to the client's unconscious mind, and gives it suggestions that it then uses to solve the client's problem. In the title story, Calof helps a couple on the verge of divorce to understand each other's point of view by suggesting they role-play while in a hypnotic trance. Far more dramatic is his account of using hypnosis to enable a client to undergo five-hour facial surgery without chemical anesthesia. Calof's descriptions of his own discomfort in the operating room and of the surgeon's attitude toward his methods ring true. In one story, Calof contends that a client cured herself of cervical cancer by using imagery to direct her immune system to kill the malignant cells; skeptics will note, however, that other explanations are possible. Similarly, his account of an artist client whose progressive blindness was reversed during therapy lacks the kind of data needed to be truly persuasive. Throughout, Calof has reconstructed dialogue from memory, greatly condensed therapeutic sessions, and focused on the breakthrough moments. While this gives his stories more impact than straightforward case histories, it also makes him as the therapist seem unbelievably perceptive. Once the reader begins to question the hypnotherapeutic process, further questions about its amazing results are inevitable. Nevertheless, the two accounts in the epilogue of incidents in which Calof used self-hypnosis to overcome his own physical pain and fear of falling are credible demonstrations of that technique's well-established usefulness. May appeal to enthusiasts of alternative healing, but too weak to win over many mainstreamers.

Pub Date: Nov. 1, 1996

ISBN: 0-553-09668-0

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Bantam

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1996

Categories:
Next book

THINKING, FAST AND SLOW

Striking research showing the immense complexity of ordinary thought and revealing the identities of the gatekeepers in our...

A psychologist and Nobel Prize winner summarizes and synthesizes the recent decades of research on intuition and systematic thinking.

The author of several scholarly texts, Kahneman (Emeritus Psychology and Public Affairs/Princeton Univ.) now offers general readers not just the findings of psychological research but also a better understanding of how research questions arise and how scholars systematically frame and answer them. He begins with the distinction between System 1 and System 2 mental operations, the former referring to quick, automatic thought, the latter to more effortful, overt thinking. We rely heavily, writes, on System 1, resorting to the higher-energy System 2 only when we need or want to. Kahneman continually refers to System 2 as “lazy”: We don’t want to think rigorously about something. The author then explores the nuances of our two-system minds, showing how they perform in various situations. Psychological experiments have repeatedly revealed that our intuitions are generally wrong, that our assessments are based on biases and that our System 1 hates doubt and despises ambiguity. Kahneman largely avoids jargon; when he does use some (“heuristics,” for example), he argues that such terms really ought to join our everyday vocabulary. He reviews many fundamental concepts in psychology and statistics (regression to the mean, the narrative fallacy, the optimistic bias), showing how they relate to his overall concerns about how we think and why we make the decisions that we do. Some of the later chapters (dealing with risk-taking and statistics and probabilities) are denser than others (some readers may resent such demands on System 2!), but the passages that deal with the economic and political implications of the research are gripping.

Striking research showing the immense complexity of ordinary thought and revealing the identities of the gatekeepers in our minds.

Pub Date: Nov. 1, 2011

ISBN: 978-0-374-27563-1

Page Count: 512

Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Review Posted Online: Sept. 3, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2011

Next book

THE ART OF THINKING CLEARLY

Hiccups aside, a mostly valuable compendium of irrational thinking, with a handful of blanket corrective maneuvers.

A waggish, cautionary compilation of pitfalls associated with systematic cognitive errors, from novelist Dobelli.

To be human is to err, routinely and with bias. We exercise deviation from logic, writes the author, as much as, and possibly more than, we display optimal reasoning. In an effort to bring awareness to this sorry state of affairs, he has gathered here—in three-page, anecdotally saturated squibs—nearly 100 examples of muddied thinking. Many will ring familiar to readers (Dobelli’s illustrations are not startlingly original, but observant)—e.g., herd instinct and groupthink, hindsight, overconfidence, the lack of an intuitive grasp of probability or statistical reality. Others, if not new, are smartly encapsulated: social loafing, the hourly rate trap, decision fatigue, carrying on with a lost cause (the sunk-cost fallacy). Most of his points stick home: the deformation of professional thinking, of which Mark Twain said, “If your only tool is a hammer, all your problems will be nails”; multitasking is the illusion of attention with potentially dire results if you are eating a sloppy sandwich while driving on a busy street. In his quest for clarity, Dobelli mostly brings shrewdness, skepticism and wariness to bear, but he can also be opaque—e.g., shaping the details of history “into a consistent story...we speak about ‘understanding,’ but these things cannot be understood in the traditional sense. We simply build the meaning into them afterward.” Well, yes. And if we are to be wary of stories, what are we to make of his many telling anecdotes when he counsels, “Anecdotes are a particularly tricky sort of cherry picking....To rebuff an anecdote is difficult because it is a mini-story, and we know how vulnerable our brains are to those”?

Hiccups aside, a mostly valuable compendium of irrational thinking, with a handful of blanket corrective maneuvers.

Pub Date: May 14, 2013

ISBN: 978-0-06-221968-8

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Harper/HarperCollins

Review Posted Online: March 5, 2013

Kirkus Reviews Issue: April 1, 2013

Categories:
Close Quickview