A refreshing combination of erudition and breeziness.
An always clever—but rarely too clever—educational and entertaining history of the alphabet.
Canadian journalist Sacks became fascinated with the history and use of written language while researching The Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World. Although he educated himself by delving into scholarly research on alphabets, he decided to build this work around an approachable gimmick for a lay audience. After a sweeping 40-page introduction to the origins and evolution of written language, Sacks devotes a chapter to each of the 26 letters used in the English language, which is based on the Roman alphabet. He characterizes each of the letters as extremely important or less important in daily usage, surmises how that degree of importance arose, explains whether the connotations of each letter are mostly positive or mostly negative, and sprinkles in various tidbits, ranging from surprising to downright edifying. The letter A, which, of course, comes first, frequently carries the connotation of “best,” as in a school grade of A or a Grade-A food product, but sometimes the connotation is negative, as with the scarlet letter A. The Roman alphabet is not alone in starting with A; most alphabets open with it or with its near equivalent. (Sacks explains writing systems that are not alphabetical, such as Chinese and Japanese, but does not dwell on them.) A, though, is not the most frequently written letter; E and T carry that distinction, in large part because they both appear in the oft-used word “the.” Skipping to the last letter, Sacks calls Z a consonant that “can seem racy or elusive or just plain disadvantaged.” The potential indignity of being the alphabet's caboose is compounded by one real weakness—Z is, on average, the least-used letter in printed English.” But it sure can increase a Scrabble score when used skillfully.
A refreshing combination of erudition and breeziness.Pub Date: Aug. 19, 2003
ISBN: 0-7679-1172-5
Page Count: 224
Publisher: Broadway
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 15, 2003
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
