The self-styled radical educator (``I Won't Learn from You,'' 1994, etc.) collects meandering, utterly predictable essays on the importance of narrative in the education of children. The title essay is hardly the incendiary piece it purports to be. Rather, Kohl rehearses the standard worries about kiddie culture: It's too violent, racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. The Babar books in particular suffer from their Eurocentric power relations and their celebration of assimilation; Kohl's analysis, by way of Frantz Fanon, links Babar to the triumph of colonialism. Among the other diversions popular with children that come under attack along the way is the Barbie doll, derided as ``part of the complex that can lead to bulimia and anorexia.'' But Kohl lacks the courage of his convictions and soft-pedals his radicalism with caveats, usually in someone else's voice (``Sometimes an elephant in a green suit is just an elephant in a green suit''). After an essay in which he rewrites the standard textbook version of Rosa Parks's story, which focuses on the courageous individual, so that it reflects instead ``community-based social struggle,'' Kohl reveals his true agenda in ``A Plea for Radical Children's Literature,'' which includes a series of prescriptions reminiscent of old social-realist proletarianism and Soviet-style utopianism. He suggests what this sort of literature would look like by drawing attention to some neglected books by Geoffrey Trease, Virginia Hamilton, and Vera Williamsall of which allegedly embody ``working-class pride'' and ``democratic socialist ideals.'' Two essays on American progressive educators turn attention to forgotten figures on the Left, from New York educator Angelo Patri to radical textbook author Harold Rugg, the bane of fundamentalists and capitalists. Kohl's emphasis on the ``nurturing tradition'' reflects his love of the empty bromide and his annoying rectitude. The essence of PC educational ideals.
Pub Date: July 15, 1995
ISBN: 1-56584-258-8
Page Count: 192
Publisher: The New Press
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 15, 1995
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
