Next book

THE DEVIL AND DR. FAUCI

THE MANY FACES OF BUREAUCRATIC EVIL

A mean-spirited and unconvincing polemic.

A pro–Donald Trump LGBTQ+ activist takes on Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical adviser to the president of the United States.

Driscoll, a literary critic with a doctorate from the University of Wisconsin, has a distinguished publication history that includes scholarly books on Shakespeare, John Milton, and Carl Jung. His three decades as an LGBTQ+ activist culminated in the 1990s, when he was a leading voice against the Food and Drug Administration, whose red tape delayed availability of lifesaving AIDS treatments. In this book, he combines a firm command of literature with his disdain for American medical bureaucracy. Its titular villain is Fauci, who’s compared to Dr. Faustus of lore. Both, he claims, are “egocentric” men driven by “the shared lust to possess the black magic of power, fame, and forbidden knowledge.” The author portrays Fauci as the personification of America’s flawed “Drug Testing, Licensing, and Marketing Complex,” embodying the “self-serving excesses” and “dangerously deficient oversight” of a bureaucracy he heads. Chief among Fauci’s mistakes, according to Driscoll, was his endorsement of lockdowns that led to “collateral damage” that outpaced Covid-19’s toll, including deaths due to undiagnosed cancer, suicide, substance abuse, and depression, as well as a collapse in birthrates. If Fauci is the book’s evil “Pied Piper,” its “heroic” protagonist is Trump, the author asserts. Although Trump pressured the “dilatory FDA” to push through a vaccine, his tragic error was tasking Vice President Mike Pence (“the Swamp’s most predictable yes man”) to head the Covid-19 response. Pence’s failures not only included bowing to Fauci, according to the author, but also his refusal to assist Trump during the events of January 6, 2021.

Much of the book’s middle section moves far beyond Fauci with conspiracy-laden claims. Pence, former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, and other establishment Republicans are attacked for allegedly abandoning “an accurate count of the votes.” Most shocking is the book’s venom toward what the author calls “Woke hooligans” whom he says embrace “reverse Jim Crowe [sic] discrimination” in the form of critical race theory. The work ignores the history of Black scholars in developing critical race theory inside niche academic fields, and instead turns it into an undefined straw man whose supporters aren’t driven by intellectualism, but by “religious fanaticism” akin to Nazism. Perhaps most glaring is the book’s claim that “CRT bullies” are not informed by data and that their “argument of choice is the ad hominem.” This is a particularly cognitively dissonant claim in a book whose premise is to analyze Fauci’s bureaucratic “Satanic power drive” and whose prose is rife with ad hominemquips. Additionally, although there’s an argument to be made that bureaucracies “instill an amoral totalitarian code,” the book’s survey of bureaucracies from Pharaonic Egypt to the present ignores the 19th-century origins of modern bureaucracies, which offered citizens meritocracies that broke aristocratic control over the levers of power. And although a reasoned critique of Fauci’s handling of the Covid-19 crisis is possible, this book dispels its own credibility with its penchant for the absurd.

A mean-spirited and unconvincing polemic.

Pub Date: Oct. 15, 2021

ISBN: 978-1680537475

Page Count: 152

Publisher: Academica Press

Review Posted Online: Dec. 2, 2021

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 71


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

THE GREATEST SENTENCE EVER WRITTEN

A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 71


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Words that made a nation.

Isaacson is known for expansive biographies of great thinkers (and Elon Musk), but here he pens a succinct, stimulating commentary on the Founding Fathers’ ode to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” His close reading of the Declaration of Independence’s second sentence, published to mark the 250th anniversary of the document’s adoption, doesn’t downplay its “moral contradiction.” Thomas Jefferson enslaved hundreds of people yet called slavery “a cruel war against human nature” in his first draft of the Declaration. All but 15 of the document’s 56 signers owned enslaved people. While the sentence in question asserted “all men are created equal” and possess “unalienable rights,” the Founders “consciously and intentionally” excluded women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. And yet the sentence is powerful, Isaacson writes, because it names a young nation’s “aspirations.” He mounts a solid defense of what ought to be shared goals, among them economic fairness, “moral compassion,” and a willingness to compromise. “Democracy depends on this,” he writes. Isaacson is excellent when explaining how Enlightenment intellectuals abroad influenced the founders. Benjamin Franklin, one of the Declaration’s “five-person drafting committee,” stayed in David Hume’s home for a month in the early 1770s, “discussing ideas of natural rights” with the Scottish philosopher. Also strong is Isaacson’s discussion of the “edits and tweaks” made to Jefferson’s draft. As recommended by Franklin and others, the changes were substantial, leaving Jefferson “distraught.” Franklin, who emerges as the book’s hero, helped establish municipal services, founded a library, and encouraged religious diversity—the kind of civic-mindedness that we could use more of today, Isaacson reminds us.

A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.

Pub Date: Nov. 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781982181314

Page Count: 80

Publisher: Simon & Schuster

Review Posted Online: Aug. 29, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview