Next book

THE DEVIL AND DR. FAUCI

THE MANY FACES OF BUREAUCRATIC EVIL

A mean-spirited and unconvincing polemic.

A pro–Donald Trump LGBTQ+ activist takes on Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical adviser to the president of the United States.

Driscoll, a literary critic with a doctorate from the University of Wisconsin, has a distinguished publication history that includes scholarly books on Shakespeare, John Milton, and Carl Jung. His three decades as an LGBTQ+ activist culminated in the 1990s, when he was a leading voice against the Food and Drug Administration, whose red tape delayed availability of lifesaving AIDS treatments. In this book, he combines a firm command of literature with his disdain for American medical bureaucracy. Its titular villain is Fauci, who’s compared to Dr. Faustus of lore. Both, he claims, are “egocentric” men driven by “the shared lust to possess the black magic of power, fame, and forbidden knowledge.” The author portrays Fauci as the personification of America’s flawed “Drug Testing, Licensing, and Marketing Complex,” embodying the “self-serving excesses” and “dangerously deficient oversight” of a bureaucracy he heads. Chief among Fauci’s mistakes, according to Driscoll, was his endorsement of lockdowns that led to “collateral damage” that outpaced Covid-19’s toll, including deaths due to undiagnosed cancer, suicide, substance abuse, and depression, as well as a collapse in birthrates. If Fauci is the book’s evil “Pied Piper,” its “heroic” protagonist is Trump, the author asserts. Although Trump pressured the “dilatory FDA” to push through a vaccine, his tragic error was tasking Vice President Mike Pence (“the Swamp’s most predictable yes man”) to head the Covid-19 response. Pence’s failures not only included bowing to Fauci, according to the author, but also his refusal to assist Trump during the events of January 6, 2021.

Much of the book’s middle section moves far beyond Fauci with conspiracy-laden claims. Pence, former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, and other establishment Republicans are attacked for allegedly abandoning “an accurate count of the votes.” Most shocking is the book’s venom toward what the author calls “Woke hooligans” whom he says embrace “reverse Jim Crowe [sic] discrimination” in the form of critical race theory. The work ignores the history of Black scholars in developing critical race theory inside niche academic fields, and instead turns it into an undefined straw man whose supporters aren’t driven by intellectualism, but by “religious fanaticism” akin to Nazism. Perhaps most glaring is the book’s claim that “CRT bullies” are not informed by data and that their “argument of choice is the ad hominem.” This is a particularly cognitively dissonant claim in a book whose premise is to analyze Fauci’s bureaucratic “Satanic power drive” and whose prose is rife with ad hominemquips. Additionally, although there’s an argument to be made that bureaucracies “instill an amoral totalitarian code,” the book’s survey of bureaucracies from Pharaonic Egypt to the present ignores the 19th-century origins of modern bureaucracies, which offered citizens meritocracies that broke aristocratic control over the levers of power. And although a reasoned critique of Fauci’s handling of the Covid-19 crisis is possible, this book dispels its own credibility with its penchant for the absurd.

A mean-spirited and unconvincing polemic.

Pub Date: Oct. 15, 2021

ISBN: 978-1680537475

Page Count: 152

Publisher: Academica Press

Review Posted Online: Dec. 2, 2021

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 174


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 174


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

THE JAILHOUSE LAWYER

An eye-opening look at prison life from the point of view of a true warrior for justice.

A memoir on the making of a literal “jailhouse lawyer.”

Wrongfully arrested and convicted of murder in New Orleans, which at the time had “the highest rate of wrongful convictions in the nation, with nearly all the victims being Black men who…grew up poor,” Duncan served for 23 years in Louisiana’s notorious Angola prison and other institutions. He might have done his time at the Orleans Parish Prison, but, he writes, he wanted access to Angola’s more extensive law library. Well before being transferred there, he petitioned the Louisiana Supreme Court for a law book, a motion denied because it had not first been adjudicated in a lower court. A sympathetic judge gave him a copy all the same, and Duncan was off to a career as an inmate advocate, regularly filing petitions and lawsuits on his own behalf and that of his fellow prisoners—the first suit being “over the jail’s failure to provide him with a high-fiber diet,” soon followed by motions to provide mental health treatment, end beatings and arbitrary punishments, and improve medical care. Known as the “Snickers Lawyer” for taking payment in candy, he became a self-taught expert on constitutional issues. Naturally, he recounts, he was targeted by guards and wardens for his legal activism, even as he proved essential to Angola’s population; in time, too, he found a few unlikely allies among the staff. Duncan’s well-told story is full of fraught moments of abuse both physical and judicial, though it has something of a happy ending in that, after earning a law degree after his release, he was exonerated of the crime and has since been fighting for other prisoners to “have meaningful access to the courts.”

An eye-opening look at prison life from the point of view of a true warrior for justice.

Pub Date: July 8, 2025

ISBN: 9780593834305

Page Count: 400

Publisher: Penguin Press

Review Posted Online: April 17, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 15, 2025

Close Quickview