Those wanting a fleshed-out argument will be disappointed.
A collection for truth-seekers that covers subjects from Catholicism to Salinger.
Palmer makes a case for faith, not religion, in this collection of writings about a hodgepodge of topics. “Religion is not faith,” he says. “Religion is a group of people doing something together that hurts other people…Faith, however, is belief in God in spite of the clergy or the scientists.” He also alludes to recently published books on atheism by writers Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, whom he calls “pop-atheists,” likening them to science-fiction or fantasy writers. Palmer’s premise is interesting, and if he followed up this thesis the book would be a worthwhile read. However, what follows is a mishmash of quoted material. The quotes aren’t woven into his writing; he aligns them against each other to make a point and often doesn’t bother to extrapolate upon them. He quotes Marx, Darwin, Camus, Dorothy Parker, the Bible, Orwell and Malcom Gladwell, among others. Interspersed within the quotes are sweeping grandiose statements about the human condition, such as “people don’t want freedom,” but he doesn’t use his material to explain why individuals huddle together and use religion as a shelter. Or, if he does, he offers platitudes. The book feels pasted together, rather than a well-developed argument on his thoughts and feelings about faith. Palmer spends a chapter interpreting the Catcher in the Rye and another chapter ruminating to his great-granddaughter about the state of the world. He makes an impassioned argument for Catholicism being the one true religion, but it’s only followed-up in snippets. Perhaps if the book were redefined as a collection of his essays it might work, but it may not be entirely clear what he thinks of faith itself. It’s too buried under the quotes of others.
Those wanting a fleshed-out argument will be disappointed.Pub Date: March 1, 2009
ISBN: 978-0-9811-9800-2
Page Count: -
Publisher: N/A
Review Posted Online: May 23, 2010
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
