The artistically lauded but politically tainted film director reveals his method and insights in this capacious interview collection. In 1971, director (later producer) Young persuaded Kazan, his favorite director, to sit for hundreds of interviews, on the stipulation that they would be published in book form only after Kazan’s autobiography appeared. It was worth the wait. Young’s book records Kazan’s views on each of his films, from A Tree Grows in Brooklyn (1945) through The Visitors (1972), with Young commenting on Kazan’s final work, The Last Tycoon (1976), for which there was no interview. The most interesting material provided by this psychologically oriented director (co-founder of the Actors Studio) is his takes on actors, about whom he is extremely perceptive, and on the role of character in films. Kazan says his films are sparked by a protagonist with an “inner conflict” that results in meaningful change. Brando was ideal for him: “mature and adolescent at the same time.” In James Dean he immediately spotted “vicious hatred and anger because of love frustrated.” Whether discussing actors, editing, or scoring, Kazan presents himself as a humanist. Though pressed, he refuses to codify his technique: “You develop your own methodology each time out.” As for Kazan’s decision to name names to the House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1952, Young (whose family was affected by the blacklist) probes but opens no new ground. The director reiterates that he acted “out of principle . . . I thought that was the right thing to do.” Kazan’s revelations prompt interest in less-seen films (Wild River) and generate questions about what makes for enduring art. What is the alchemy of immediacy and universality that makes On the Waterfront a classic but Gentlemen’s Agreement an antique? Though debate over Kazan’s ethics continues, his works stand, and his reflections on them make this a valuable piece of film history. (60 b&w illustrations, not seen)
Pub Date: June 1, 1999
ISBN: 1-55704-338-8
Page Count: 352
Publisher: Newmarket Press
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 15, 1999
BOOK REVIEW
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
