Next book

MISEDUCATION

HOW CLIMATE CHANGE IS TAUGHT IN AMERICA

More solid evidence of the politicization of everything, including the truth.

A damning report on the state of science education in America, especially regarding climate change.

As background for her concise and rigorous analysis of climate education, Frontline investigative journalist Worth developed a nationwide, state-by-state database and reviewed dozens of textbooks. As she notes, there are roughly 50 million children enrolled in 100,000 public schools across the country, taught by 3 million teachers—and there are no national standards. The result, not surprisingly, is a sharp red-blue divide. The red side is bolstered by ample investments from fossil fuel producers and strict controls from conservative activists, and red states, notably Texas, are fitted with textbooks that cast doubt about the concept of human-caused climate change. Overall, Worth writes, “classrooms have emerged as a battleground in the American political war over climate change because what kids learn about climate change now will directly impact the speed and ambition of action taken for decades to come.” It stands to reason that in the red states, that action will be nonexistent. Worth writes of an AP science teacher in Oklahoma who refuses to teach anthropogenic climate change because her family is in the oil and gas business—were she to want to teach it in the first place, since many districts and states forbid its inclusion in the curriculum. The divide widens: As Worth notes, “we know that as lawmakers in some red states have worked to shrink what their children learn about climate change, lawmakers in some blue states have worked to expand them.” It may depress some readers to hear of this “crude two-tier system” as well as to learn of the author’s investigations into textbook publishing and reviewing, with editors rewriting commissioned science pieces to fit political formulas. “These patterns are no accident of history,” Worth concludes. “Rather, they are the product of successful disinformation campaigns, animated not by science but by ideology.”

More solid evidence of the politicization of everything, including the truth.

Pub Date: Nov. 9, 2021

ISBN: 978-1-73591-364-3

Page Count: 150

Publisher: Columbia Global Reports

Review Posted Online: Sept. 9, 2021

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2021

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Next book

GOD, THE SCIENCE, THE EVIDENCE

THE DAWN OF A REVOLUTION

A remarkably thorough and thoughtful case for the reconciliation between science and faith.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

A duo of French mathematicians makes the scientific case for God in this nonfiction book.

Since its 2021 French-language publication in Paris, this work by Bolloré and Bonnassies has sold more than 400,000 copies. Now translated into English for the first time by West and Jones, the book offers a new introduction featuring endorsements from a range of scientists and religious leaders, including Nobel Prize-winning astronomers and Roman Catholic cardinals. This appeal to authority, both religious and scientific, distinguishes this volume from a genre of Christian apologetics that tends to reject, rather than embrace, scientific consensus. Central to the book’s argument is that contemporary scientific advancements have undone past emphases on materialist interpretations of the universe (and their parallel doubts of spirituality). According to the authors’ reasoned arguments, what now forms people’s present understanding of the universe—including quantum mechanics, relativity, and the Big Bang—puts “the question of the existence of a creator God back on the table,” given the underlying implications. Einstein’s theory of relativity, for instance, presupposes that if a cause exists behind the origin of the universe, then it must be atemporal, non-spatial, and immaterial. While the book’s contentions related to Christianity specifically, such as its belief in the “indisputable truths contained in the Bible,” may not be as convincing as its broader argument on how the idea of a creator God fits into contemporary scientific understanding, the volume nevertheless offers a refreshingly nuanced approach to the topic. From the work’s outset, the authors (academically trained in math and engineering) reject fundamentalist interpretations of creationism (such as claims that Earth is only 6,000 years old) as “fanciful beliefs” while challenging the philosophical underpinnings of a purely materialist understanding of the universe that may not fit into recent scientific paradigm shifts. Featuring over 500 pages and more than 600 research notes, this book strikes a balance between its academic foundations and an accessible writing style, complemented by dozens of photographs from various sources, diagrams, and charts.

A remarkably thorough and thoughtful case for the reconciliation between science and faith.

Pub Date: Oct. 14, 2025

ISBN: 9789998782402

Page Count: 562

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: Oct. 7, 2025

Next book

THE RIGHT STUFF

Yes: it's high time for a de-romanticized, de-mythified, close-up retelling of the U.S. Space Program's launching—the inside story of those first seven astronauts.

But no: jazzy, jivey, exclamation-pointed, italicized Tom Wolfe "Mr. Overkill" hasn't really got the fight stuff for the job. Admittedly, he covers all the ground. He begins with the competitive, macho world of test pilots from which the astronauts came (thus being grossly overqualified to just sit in a controlled capsule); he follows the choosing of the Seven, the preparations for space flight, the flights themselves, the feelings of the wives; and he presents the breathless press coverage, the sudden celebrity, the glorification. He even throws in some of the technology. But instead of replacing the heroic standard version with the ring of truth, Wolfe merely offers an alternative myth: a surreal, satiric, often cartoony Wolfe-arama that, especially since there isn't a bit of documentation along the way, has one constantly wondering if anything really happened the way Wolfe tells it. His astronauts (referred to as "the brethren" or "The True Brothers") are obsessed with having the "right stuff" that certain blend of guts and smarts that spells pilot success. The Press is a ravenous fool, always referred to as "the eternal Victorian Gent": when Walter Cronkite's voice breaks while reporting a possible astronaut death, "There was the Press the Genteel Gent, coming up with the appropriate emotion. . . live. . . with no prompting whatsoever!" And, most off-puttingly, Wolfe presumes to enter the minds of one and all: he's with near-drowing Gus Grissom ("Cox. . . That face up there!—it's Cox. . . Cox knew how to get people out of here! . . . Cox! . . ."); he's with Betty Grissom angry about not staying at Holiday Inn ("Now. . . they truly owed her"); and, in a crude hatchet-job, he's with John Glenn furious at Al Shepard's being chosen for the first flight, pontificating to the others about their licentious behavior, or holding onto his self-image during his flight ("Oh, yes! I've been here before! And I am immune! I don't get into corners I can't get out of! . . . The Presbyterian Pilot was not about to foul up. His pipeline to dear Lord could not be clearer"). Certainly there's much here that Wolfe is quite right about, much that people will be interested in hearing: the P-R whitewash of Grissom's foul-up, the Life magazine excesses, the inter-astronaut tensions. And, for those who want to give Wolfe the benefit of the doubt throughout, there are emotional reconstructions that are juicily shrill.

But most readers outside the slick urban Wolfe orbit will find credibility fatally undermined by the self-indulgent digressions, the stylistic excesses, and the broadly satiric, anti-All-American stance; and, though The Right Stuff has enough energy, sass, and dirt to attract an audience, it mostly suggests that until Wolfe can put his subject first and his preening writing-persona second, he probably won't be a convincing chronicler of anything much weightier than radical chic.

Pub Date: Sept. 24, 1979

ISBN: 0312427565

Page Count: 370

Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Review Posted Online: Oct. 13, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1979

Close Quickview