Enlightening reading.
A collection of essays written by transgender military personnel that shed light on the unvoiced experiences of trans people in the American armed services.
Embser-Herbert is a sociology professor and Army veteran, and Fram is a lieutenant colonel in the Space Force and president of the transgender military advocacy group SPART*A. In 2016, the Obama administration officially allowed trans men and women to serve as members of the military. This landmark legislation—overturned by the Trump administration a year later—was intended to address issues of trans inclusion that had been left out of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal act. Embser-Herbert takes their earlier research on how the lives of transgender military personnel “illuminate…understanding of gender” and transforms it into a study that showcases a series of firsthand accounts by trans soldiers. While the DADT repeal allowed gays, lesbians, and bisexuals the freedom “to serve openly and authentically,” it did not help trans people, whom the Department of Defense still continued to discharge. Embser-Herbert follows this analysis with testimonials from trans veterans who left the military before the Obama administration’s 2016 announcement. Some, like Sheri A. Swokowski, faced discrimination and job loss once they came out of the closet and even after they left the military. Others, like Evan Young, felt compelled to leave the armed services to lead more authentic lives. The voices in other chapters belong to current trans armed forces personnel. Many, like co-editor Fram, discuss their race to transition before the 2019 Trump ban officially disallowed physical transition for service members identifying as trans. All speak of finding support among their colleagues; one, Sterling Crutcher, even praises the military for offering the succor his own family did not. This candid, illuminating collection will appeal to military historians with an interest in gender or to gender scholars seeking to address issues pertaining to trans marginalization.
Enlightening reading.Pub Date: Nov. 9, 2021
ISBN: 978-1-4798-0103-9
Page Count: 240
Publisher: New York Univ.
Review Posted Online: Sept. 21, 2021
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2021
Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.
“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.
It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.
Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0
Page Count: 432
Publisher: PublicAffairs
Review Posted Online: Aug. 28, 2019
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019
SEEN & HEARD
Deliberately provocative, with much for left-inclined activists to ponder.
A wide-ranging critique of leftist politics as not being left enough.
Continuing his examination of progressive reform movements begun with The Cult of Smart, Marxist analyst deBoer takes on a left wing that, like all political movements, is subject to “the inertia of established systems.” The great moment for the left, he suggests, ought to have been the summer of 2020, when the murder of George Floyd and the accumulated crimes of Donald Trump should have led to more than a minor upheaval. In Minneapolis, he writes, first came the call from the city council to abolish the police, then make reforms, then cut the budget; the grace note was “an increase in funding to the very department it had recently set about to dissolve.” What happened? The author answers with the observation that it is largely those who can afford it who populate the ranks of the progressive movement, and they find other things to do after a while, even as those who stand to benefit most from progressive reform “lack the cultural capital and economic stability to have a presence in our national media and politics.” The resulting “elite capture” explains why the Democratic Party is so ineffectual in truly representing minority and working-class constituents. Dispirited, deBoer writes, “no great American revolution is coming in the early twenty-first century.” Accommodation to gradualism was once counted heresy among doctrinaire Marxists, but deBoer holds that it’s likely the only truly available path toward even small-scale gains. Meanwhile, he scourges nonprofits for diluting the tax base. It would be better, he argues, to tax those who can afford it rather than allowing deductible donations and “reducing the availability of public funds for public uses.” Usefully, the author also argues that identity politics centering on difference will never build a left movement, which instead must find common cause against conservatism and fascism.
Deliberately provocative, with much for left-inclined activists to ponder.Pub Date: Sept. 5, 2023
ISBN: 9781668016015
Page Count: 256
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Review Posted Online: June 28, 2023
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2023
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
