Palmer is one of the better American obscurantists now working (Clark Coolidge and Lyn Hijenian being two others). He has a...

READ REVIEW

NOTES FOR ECHO LAKE

Palmer is one of the better American obscurantists now working (Clark Coolidge and Lyn Hijenian being two others). He has a talent for radically dispersed argument: ""Ideas as elements of the working not as propositions of a work, even in a propositional art (Someone said someone thought)."" And he has taken up the valuable but neglected thread provided by the language-investigating poets of San Francisco in the 1950s: Robert Duncan (Writing Writing) and Jack Spicer (The Heads of the Two up to the Aether). So now, in this collection, Palmer fashions an image-Echo Lake--to serve as a sign, a semiotic, for the pathos of perpetual re-beginning that is language: ""To be at a loss for words. How does the mind move there, walking beside the bank of what had been a river."" But though these ""Echo Lake"" notes are all interesting, only parts 4 and 12 prove wholly successful and the shorter poems here work far better than the longer ones-perhaps because of the almost knell-like strictness of tone in Palmer's voice: ""Singing first the solemn, imaginary/ world of brilliant error/recognized/as twin to that paradise/ against which day breaks."" When extenuated, this tone can seem humorless, granitic, even passionless--an oblique coverup for vagueness, solid only in its theoretical notions. But in shorter forms, it's a voice which--like early Eugenio Montale--prods the poem's words to dry and bleach like a memorable arrangement of bones. Palmer is now clearly coming into his stride, and if orthodoxy and a tendency toward excess elaboration do not hold it back, it's one that we can expect to be important.

Pub Date: April 15, 1981

ISBN: N/A

Page Count: -

Publisher: North Point Press

Review Posted Online: N/A

Kirkus Reviews Issue: April 1, 1981

Close Quickview