Next book

TECHNOLOGY AND BARBARISM

OR: HOW BILLIONAIRES WILL SAVE US FROM THE END OF THE WORLD

An ominous, occasionally blurry vision.

A portentous collection of essays about big tech and literature in the Anthropocene.

Built on the idea that “technology is the border between civilization and barbarism,” these serpentine essays explore advancements in science and medicine and highlight the cultural casualties lost in society’s race toward the future. Sarcastically titled “Capitalist Science Fiction: How Billionaires Will Save the World,” the first part of the book showcases the influence of science fiction on the likes of Elon Musk and Sam Altman but highlights how “contaminating” their work is: “This disassociation between the dazzling ecological technologies that ­will save humanity and the contaminating and highly precarious conditions of their production is the pasture that feeds the colonial discourse of cap­italist science fiction.” Nieva (Dengue Boy, 2025) notes that a Tesla’s lithium battery depends on the “consumption of 2.2 million liters of drinking ­water for each ton of mineral, which happens to be extracted from desert areas with water deficits,” such as Argentina, where the author was born. Nieva finds many paths back to Argentina throughout the collection, to the extent that readers might question whether this book is more interested in technological developments or Argentina’s storied history. He writes, “Argentinian lit­erature is born from, and imbued with, this problematic crux…their exact point of encounter, of friction and crossing.” Other essays repeatedly invoke Domingo Faustino Sarmiento’s Facundo and the stories of Jorge Luis Borges. Nieva revels in placing seemingly incongruent outlooks in proximity to illuminate their hidden connections. Observing Silicon Valley through the lens of vintage science fiction exposes the rottenness beneath its futuristic ambitions. One essay discusses virology and expands to explore Argentina’s borders and wars. Elsewhere, a Stanislaw Lem text leads to a critical take on ChatGPT. The apocalypse looms in these energetic texts, but their outlook often lands more cloudy than stormy. Nieva attempts to explore so much, but in doing so leaves his ideas lacking cohesion.

An ominous, occasionally blurry vision.

Pub Date: Feb. 24, 2026

ISBN: 9781662603181

Page Count: 240

Publisher: Astra House

Review Posted Online: Nov. 8, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Dec. 15, 2025

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Next book

GOD, THE SCIENCE, THE EVIDENCE

THE DAWN OF A REVOLUTION

A remarkably thorough and thoughtful case for the reconciliation between science and faith.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

A duo of French mathematicians makes the scientific case for God in this nonfiction book.

Since its 2021 French-language publication in Paris, this work by Bolloré and Bonnassies has sold more than 400,000 copies. Now translated into English for the first time by West and Jones, the book offers a new introduction featuring endorsements from a range of scientists and religious leaders, including Nobel Prize-winning astronomers and Roman Catholic cardinals. This appeal to authority, both religious and scientific, distinguishes this volume from a genre of Christian apologetics that tends to reject, rather than embrace, scientific consensus. Central to the book’s argument is that contemporary scientific advancements have undone past emphases on materialist interpretations of the universe (and their parallel doubts of spirituality). According to the authors’ reasoned arguments, what now forms people’s present understanding of the universe—including quantum mechanics, relativity, and the Big Bang—puts “the question of the existence of a creator God back on the table,” given the underlying implications. Einstein’s theory of relativity, for instance, presupposes that if a cause exists behind the origin of the universe, then it must be atemporal, non-spatial, and immaterial. While the book’s contentions related to Christianity specifically, such as its belief in the “indisputable truths contained in the Bible,” may not be as convincing as its broader argument on how the idea of a creator God fits into contemporary scientific understanding, the volume nevertheless offers a refreshingly nuanced approach to the topic. From the work’s outset, the authors (academically trained in math and engineering) reject fundamentalist interpretations of creationism (such as claims that Earth is only 6,000 years old) as “fanciful beliefs” while challenging the philosophical underpinnings of a purely materialist understanding of the universe that may not fit into recent scientific paradigm shifts. Featuring over 500 pages and more than 600 research notes, this book strikes a balance between its academic foundations and an accessible writing style, complemented by dozens of photographs from various sources, diagrams, and charts.

A remarkably thorough and thoughtful case for the reconciliation between science and faith.

Pub Date: Oct. 14, 2025

ISBN: 9789998782402

Page Count: 562

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: Oct. 7, 2025

Next book

THE RIGHT STUFF

Yes: it's high time for a de-romanticized, de-mythified, close-up retelling of the U.S. Space Program's launching—the inside story of those first seven astronauts.

But no: jazzy, jivey, exclamation-pointed, italicized Tom Wolfe "Mr. Overkill" hasn't really got the fight stuff for the job. Admittedly, he covers all the ground. He begins with the competitive, macho world of test pilots from which the astronauts came (thus being grossly overqualified to just sit in a controlled capsule); he follows the choosing of the Seven, the preparations for space flight, the flights themselves, the feelings of the wives; and he presents the breathless press coverage, the sudden celebrity, the glorification. He even throws in some of the technology. But instead of replacing the heroic standard version with the ring of truth, Wolfe merely offers an alternative myth: a surreal, satiric, often cartoony Wolfe-arama that, especially since there isn't a bit of documentation along the way, has one constantly wondering if anything really happened the way Wolfe tells it. His astronauts (referred to as "the brethren" or "The True Brothers") are obsessed with having the "right stuff" that certain blend of guts and smarts that spells pilot success. The Press is a ravenous fool, always referred to as "the eternal Victorian Gent": when Walter Cronkite's voice breaks while reporting a possible astronaut death, "There was the Press the Genteel Gent, coming up with the appropriate emotion. . . live. . . with no prompting whatsoever!" And, most off-puttingly, Wolfe presumes to enter the minds of one and all: he's with near-drowing Gus Grissom ("Cox. . . That face up there!—it's Cox. . . Cox knew how to get people out of here! . . . Cox! . . ."); he's with Betty Grissom angry about not staying at Holiday Inn ("Now. . . they truly owed her"); and, in a crude hatchet-job, he's with John Glenn furious at Al Shepard's being chosen for the first flight, pontificating to the others about their licentious behavior, or holding onto his self-image during his flight ("Oh, yes! I've been here before! And I am immune! I don't get into corners I can't get out of! . . . The Presbyterian Pilot was not about to foul up. His pipeline to dear Lord could not be clearer"). Certainly there's much here that Wolfe is quite right about, much that people will be interested in hearing: the P-R whitewash of Grissom's foul-up, the Life magazine excesses, the inter-astronaut tensions. And, for those who want to give Wolfe the benefit of the doubt throughout, there are emotional reconstructions that are juicily shrill.

But most readers outside the slick urban Wolfe orbit will find credibility fatally undermined by the self-indulgent digressions, the stylistic excesses, and the broadly satiric, anti-All-American stance; and, though The Right Stuff has enough energy, sass, and dirt to attract an audience, it mostly suggests that until Wolfe can put his subject first and his preening writing-persona second, he probably won't be a convincing chronicler of anything much weightier than radical chic.

Pub Date: Sept. 24, 1979

ISBN: 0312427565

Page Count: 370

Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Review Posted Online: Oct. 13, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1979

Close Quickview