by Nick Holmes ‧ RELEASE DATE: May 28, 2019
A thrilling blend of historical rigor and dramatic storytelling.
Awards & Accolades
Our Verdict
GET IT
A reconsideration of the causes of the First Crusade in light of the struggle between Byzantium and invading Turks.
According to Holmes, the “brutality” and “scale” of the First Crusade was “unprecedented,” and it “reshaped the Middle Ages and served as the crucible for the modern world.” However, despite its importance in world history, its genesis isn’t always properly understood, he says. Rather than focusing on the event as the crescendo of a mounting theological conflict—a clash of religious civilizations—he reframes it as an effort to retrieve lands that Byzantium had lost to invading Seljuk Turks. First, Holmes paints a vivid picture of a decaying empire; Byzantium, he says, was actually the eastern vestige of the Roman Empire, so weakened by inconstant rule that it surrendered the gains that it had accrued during the previous century. Meanwhile, it suffered a “seemingly endless onslaught of barbarians battering at its gates,” the most dangerous of which were the Seljuk Turks, whom Holmes calls a “new superpower” of largely “nomadic tribesmen” who were recently converted Muslims. Holmes artfully depicts the new Byzantine emperor, Romanus Diogenes; he was previously arrested for taking part in a coup against the royal family, which he felt wasn’t doing enough to prepare for war. Despite Romanus’ exemplary leadership, the advances of the Seljuk Turks, under the direction of Alp Arslan, proved unstoppable. This set the stage for a wide-ranging coalition to regain the lands that Byzantium had lost as well as holy land that had been surrendered long ago, such as Jerusalem. The coalition also sought to save Byzantium from “rape, pillage, and slaughter.” In addition, the situation presented an enticing opportunity for Pope Urban II to extend his power over Constantinople.
Holmes’ history is as concise as it is astute, and his scholarship is admirably scrupulous throughout. Over the course of the book, he writes in a consistently accessible prose style that avoids the unwieldy apparatuses of academic scholarship; the work is clearly intended for a wider audience, and as a result, readers are spared extended reviews of specialized secondary literature. Holmes presents his thesis persuasively and corrects aspects of the historical record that were constructed on shaky evidentiary ground. For example, contrary to the fashionable view that Romanus was an “arrogant fool,” the author convincingly portrays him as an impressively brave and noble figure, even after he was captured: “Surrounded, Romanus fought like a lion. There isn’t a single source, pro-Romanus or anti-Romanus, which doesn't praise him as a hero.” Likewise, Arslan is distinguished by his “chivalrous behavior” and by the magnanimous way in which he offered Romanus his “hand in friendship” upon victory. Indeed, for all of Holmes’ keen historical research, the chief strength of his study is the almost novelistic way in which the drama unfolds. It’s a refreshing alternative to interpretations of the Crusades that emphasize a confrontation of spiritual worldviews rather than more terrestrial concerns, such as self-preservation, extension of empire, and aggrandizement of power.
A thrilling blend of historical rigor and dramatic storytelling.Pub Date: May 28, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-78901-758-8
Page Count: 208
Publisher: Troubador Publishing
Review Posted Online: April 28, 2020
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
Share your opinion of this book
More by Nick Holmes
BOOK REVIEW
by Nick Holmes
BOOK REVIEW
by Nick Holmes
BOOK REVIEW
by Nick Holmes
by Jack Weatherford ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 2, 2004
A horde-pleaser, well-written and full of surprises.
“The Mongols swept across the globe as conquerors,” writes the appreciative pop anthropologist-historian Weatherford (The History of Money, 1997, etc.), “but also as civilization’s unrivaled cultural carriers.”
No business-secrets fluffery here, though Weatherford does credit Genghis Khan and company for seeking “not merely to conquer the world but to impose a global order based on free trade, a single international law, and a universal alphabet with which to write all the languages of the world.” Not that the world was necessarily appreciative: the Mongols were renowned for, well, intemperance in war and peace, even if Weatherford does go rather lightly on the atrocities-and-butchery front. Instead, he accentuates the positive changes the Mongols, led by a visionary Genghis Khan, brought to the vast territories they conquered, if ever so briefly: the use of carpets, noodles, tea, playing cards, lemons, carrots, fabrics, and even a few words, including the cheer hurray. (Oh, yes, and flame throwers, too.) Why, then, has history remembered Genghis and his comrades so ungenerously? Whereas Geoffrey Chaucer considered him “so excellent a lord in all things,” Genghis is a byword for all that is savage and terrible; the word “Mongol” figures, thanks to the pseudoscientific racism of the 19th century, as the root of “mongoloid,” a condition attributed to genetic throwbacks to seed sown by Mongol invaders during their decades of ravaging Europe. (Bad science, that, but Dr. Down’s son himself argued that imbeciles “derived from an earlier form of the Mongol stock and should be considered more ‘pre-human, rather than human.’ ”) Weatherford’s lively analysis restores the Mongols’ reputation, and it takes some wonderful learned detours—into, for instance, the history of the so-called Secret History of the Mongols, which the Nazis raced to translate in the hope that it would help them conquer Russia, as only the Mongols had succeeded in doing.
A horde-pleaser, well-written and full of surprises.Pub Date: March 2, 2004
ISBN: 0-609-61062-7
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Crown
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Dec. 1, 2003
Share your opinion of this book
More by Jack Weatherford
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
by Ernie Pyle ‧ RELEASE DATE: April 26, 2001
The Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist (1900–45) collected his work from WWII in two bestselling volumes, this second published in 1944, a year before Pyle was killed by a sniper’s bullet on Okinawa. In his fine introduction to this new edition, G. Kurt Piehler (History/Univ. of Tennessee at Knoxville) celebrates Pyle’s “dense, descriptive style” and his unusual feel for the quotidian GI experience—a personal and human side to war left out of reporting on generals and their strategies. Though Piehler’s reminder about wartime censorship seems beside the point, his biographical context—Pyle was escaping a troubled marriage—is valuable. Kirkus, at the time, noted the hoopla over Pyle (Pulitzer, hugely popular syndicated column, BOMC hype) and decided it was all worth it: “the book doesn’t let the reader down.” Pyle, of course, captures “the human qualities” of men in combat, but he also provides “an extraordinary sense of the scope of the European war fronts, the variety of services involved, the men and their officers.” Despite Piehler’s current argument that Pyle ignored much of the war (particularly the seamier stuff), Kirkus in 1944 marveled at how much he was able to cover. Back then, we thought, “here’s a book that needs no selling.” Nowadays, a firm push might be needed to renew interest in this classic of modern journalism.
Pub Date: April 26, 2001
ISBN: 0-8032-8768-2
Page Count: 513
Publisher: Univ. of Nebraska
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 2001
Share your opinion of this book
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hey there, book lover.
We’re glad you found a book that interests you!
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Don’t fret. We’ll find you.