Next book

REGIME CHANGE

TOWARD A POSTLIBERAL FUTURE

Just the thing for those who use the word woke without knowing what it means.

A manifesto against liberalism in favor of a “mixed constitution.”

According to political scientist Deneen, the author of Why Liberalism Failed, it’s the fault of liberalism, to which he assigns a right and left wing, that urban elites scorn the farmers and factory workers of flyover country. It’s the fault of liberalism that no one goes to church anymore and that old-fashioned education has fallen to multiculturalism, identity politics, or any other ideology that “insist[s] that an individual or group’s perceptions of offense ought to replace appeals to any shared understanding of justice as a constraint upon tyrannical power.” That tyrannical power, of course, is the purview of the liberal elite, the people who don’t like Trump or Brexit. A little of this proposition that liberals hate “the people” goes a long way, and Deneen’s insistence that his so-called mixed constitution will level the differences between the elite and the masses is an assertion that longs for more convincing evidence. It’s unfortunate that one of the examples of family-friendly, birth-rate–promoting government that Deneen holds up is the far-right Orban regime of Hungary. It’s even more unfortunate that the conservatism it upholds is a counter to the “ethos of cosmopolitanism,” that last term being a historic antisemitic dog whistle, whether Deneen intends it that way or not. For his part, while Pope Francis may be a tad bit too liberal, Deneen seems quite happy at the thought of a Catholic state at whose vanguard is an aristocracy formed by “a kind of Aristotelian habituation in virtue.” One suspects that Deneen would find William F. Buckley too left-wing for the post-liberal regime he hopes will push aside the immoral, amoral politics of liberalism and reinvigorate “an exhausted Western civilization” through family, religion, and patriotism.

Just the thing for those who use the word woke without knowing what it means.

Pub Date: June 6, 2023

ISBN: 9780593086902

Page Count: 288

Publisher: Sentinel

Review Posted Online: April 10, 2023

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2023

Next book

FOOTBALL

A smart, rewarding consideration of football’s popularity—and eventual downfall.

A wide-ranging writer on his football fixation.

Is our biggest spectator sport “a practical means for understanding American life”? Klosterman thinks so, backing it up with funny, thought-provoking essays about TV coverage, ethical quandaries, and the rules themselves. Yet those who believe it’s a brutal relic of a less enlightened era need only wait, “because football is doomed.” Marshalling his customary blend of learned and low-culture references—Noam Chomsky, meet AC/DC—Klosterman offers an “expository obituary” of a game whose current “monocultural grip” will baffle future generations. He forecasts that economic and social forces—the NFL’s “cultivation of revenue,” changes in advertising, et al.—will end its cultural centrality. It’s hard to imagine a time when “football stops and no one cares,” but Klosterman cites an instructive precedent. Horse racing was broadly popular a century ago, when horses were more common in daily life. But that’s no longer true, and fandom has plummeted. With youth participation on a similar trajectory, Klosterman foresees a time when fewer people have a personal connection to football, rendering it a “niche” pursuit. Until then, the sport gives us much to consider, with Klosterman as our well-informed guide. Basketball is more “elegant,” but “football is the best television product ever,” its breaks between plays—“the intensity and the nothingness,” à la Sartre—provide thrills and space for reflection or conversation. For its part, the increasing “intellectual density” of the game, particularly for quarterbacks, mirrors a broader culture marked by an “ongoing escalation of corporate and technological control.” Klosterman also has compelling, counterintuitive takes on football gambling, GOAT debates, and how one major college football coach reminds him of “Laura Ingalls Wilder’s much‑loved Little House novels.” A beloved sport’s eventual death spiral has seldom been so entertaining.

A smart, rewarding consideration of football’s popularity—and eventual downfall.

Pub Date: Jan. 20, 2026

ISBN: 9780593490648

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Penguin Press

Review Posted Online: Oct. 24, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Dec. 1, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview