Accessible, well-edited selections amply demonstrating the astute thinking and sharp voice of an indispensable legal mind.
This entry in the new Penguin Liberty series focuses on the case writings of the most recognizable associate justice on the Supreme Court.
Long before she was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1993, Ginsburg, aka the Notorious RBG, was a crusader for such issues as equal protection for women, reproductive freedom, and civil rights. Stung by her own experiences of discrimination—during pregnancy, as a law student at Harvard, and through her struggle to land a clerkship despite her sterling record—she first grasped how the 14th Amendment, intended to end racial discrimination, could be interpreted to protect sex, as well. As editor Brettschneider, who also serves as the Liberty series editor, notes, “Ginsburg needed to show that sex discrimination fell into the same category as race discrimination—an arbitrary form of discrimination based in factors individuals did not have power over.” She wielded the Equal Protection Clause first as a litigator with the ACLU in Reed v. Reed (1971), which challenged an Idaho law upholding irrational stereotypes about women as inferior to men. In her arguments, she successfully rendered sex a “suspect classification.” Her work as a litigator culminated in what the editor deems her “crowning achievement in this area”: United States v. Virginia (1996), in which Ginsburg argued against the long-standing rule that “barred women from entering” Virginia Military Academy. She prevailed by establishing what she termed “skeptical scrutiny, a "standard made clear that women could not be denied opportunity simply because of their sex.” Other key cases have included such issues as pay equity, affirmative action, voting rights, and religious freedom. Furthermore, writes Brettschneider, whose shrewd shaping of this volume makes it a good choice for students and nonscholars, Ginsburg’s “famous dissent in Bush v. Gore linked the integrity of our electoral process to the security of the people’s rights.”
Accessible, well-edited selections amply demonstrating the astute thinking and sharp voice of an indispensable legal mind.Pub Date: Sept. 8, 2020
ISBN: 978-0-14-313511-1
Page Count: 176
Publisher: Penguin
Review Posted Online: June 5, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 1, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
For fans only.
The hoodie-and-shorts-clad Pennsylvania senator blends the political and personal, and often not nicely.
Fetterman’s memoir addresses three major themes. The first—and the one he leads with—is depression and mental illness, which, combined with a stroke and heart trouble, brought him to a standstill and led him to contemplate suicide. The second is his rise to national-level politics from a Rust Belt town; as he writes, he’s carved a path as a contentious player with a populist streak and a dislike for elites. There are affecting moments in his personal reminiscences, especially when he writes of the lives of his working-class neighbors in impoverished southwestern Pennsylvania, its once-prosperous Monongahela River Valley “the most heartbreaking drive in the United States.” It’s the third element that’s problematic, and that’s his in-the-trenches account of daily politics. One frequent complaint is the media, as when he writes of one incident, “I am not the first public figure to get fucked by a reporter, and I won’t be the last. What was eye-opening was the window it gave into how people with disabilities navigate a world that doesn’t give a shit.” He reserves special disdain for his Senate race opponent Mehmet Oz, about whom he wonders, “If I had run against any other candidate…would I have lost? He got beaten by a guy recovering from a stroke.” Perhaps so, and Democratic stalwarts will likely be dismayed at his apparent warmish feelings for Donald Trump and dislike of his own party’s “performative protests.” If Fetterman’s book convinces a troubled soul to seek help it will have done some good, but it’s hard to imagine that it will make much of an impression in the self-help literature. One wonders, meanwhile, at sentiments such as this: “If men are forced to choose between picking their party or keeping their balls, most men are going to choose their balls.”
For fans only.Pub Date: Nov. 11, 2025
ISBN: 9780593799826
Page Count: 240
Publisher: Crown
Review Posted Online: Nov. 17, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 2026
SEEN & HEARD
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...
A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.
Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016
ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6
Page Count: 248
Publisher: Random House
Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015
PERSPECTIVES
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
