by Walter Kirn ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 3, 2014
A book that casts long-form narrative journalism in general, and Kirn’s in particular, in an unflattering light.
The complicated, credulity-straining relationship between the author and his subject leaves the reader wondering about both of them.
This is a book about two very strange characters. One is best known as Clark Rockefeller, “the most prodigious serial imposter in recent history,” a convicted murderer, a kidnapper and a psychopath. The other is Kirn (My Mother's Bible: A Son Discovers Clues to God, 2013, etc.), a respected journalist and novelist who admits that he initially intended to exploit his relationship with his subject for a book but belatedly discovered that his subject had been exploiting him. “What a perfect mark I’d been,” writes the author. “Rationalizing, justifying, imagining. I’d worked as hard at being conned by him as he had at conning me.” The story begins, oddly enough, with the author agreeing to deliver a crippled dog from his home in Montana to the stranger with the famous surname in Manhattan. Why? He was having some financial troubles, and this unlikely scenario might result in a book. One would think that a writer with this much journalistic experience and accomplishment might do some basic background checking, yet he not only fell for the increasingly outlandish stories his source spun, he also decided to protect the relationship by refusing to write about it, even though, on first meeting, he found the purported Rockefeller “instantly annoying.” The author also describes using Ritalin to meet deadlines and Ambien to catch a few hours of sleep, carrying a gun while on assignment, marrying a girl little more than half his age after a whirlwind courtship and basically establishing himself as an unreliable narrator of a nonfiction book. After initially defending his friend’s identity against mounting evidence to the contrary, he decided to cash in: “He was conning me, but I was also conning him. The liar and murderer and heaven knows what else was correct about the writer: I betrayed him.”
A book that casts long-form narrative journalism in general, and Kirn’s in particular, in an unflattering light.Pub Date: March 3, 2014
ISBN: 978-0-87140-451-0
Page Count: 352
Publisher: Liveright/Norton
Review Posted Online: Jan. 4, 2014
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2014
Share your opinion of this book
More by Walter Kirn
BOOK REVIEW
by Walter Kirn
BOOK REVIEW
by Walter Kirn
BOOK REVIEW
by Walter Kirn
by Edward Humes ‧ RELEASE DATE: Feb. 19, 1999
Grippingly written, compellingly told, Mean Justice makes other tales on the miscarriage of justice look like pleasant little fairy tales. In the legal world crafted by the founders of the Constitution, a series of checks and balances exist to ensure that innocent people don’t go to jail. The crater-size cracks in the criminal justice system today, however, are disturbingly clear in this page-turner by Pulitzer Prize—winning journalist Humes (No Matter How Loud I Shout, 1996; Mississippi Mud, 1994; etc.). Patrick Dunn is a retired school principal whose wife, Sandy, mysteriously disappears during one of her regular predawn walks. Although Dunn reports her missing, he becomes the prime suspect—indeed, the only suspect—based almost solely on a gut feeling by one of his closest friends, a younger woman who as an appointed official in Bakersfield, Calif., has the clout and stick-to-it-iveness to push the local police and district attorney’s office to go after Dunn. Not that they need much prodding. As Hume so carefully chronicles, this is a suburban town that already has a well-documented history of convicting innocent people and, worst of all, making these crimes stick for years. Bakersfield, after all, was one of America’s prosecutorial hot spots in seeking out supposed child molestation rings in the 1980s. Humes displays his award-winning style here as he lays out both Dunn’s sad tale—he is ultimately convicted with virtually no evidence pointing to him as the killer—and the background that so chillingly puts Dunn’s story into perspective. Especially distressing is Humes’s research indicating that cases such as Dunn’s are occurring with increasing frequency. Dunn, meanwhile, remains in jail. An eye-popping tale of justice miscarried that will shock anyone who believes our criminal justice system still works just fine.
Pub Date: Feb. 19, 1999
ISBN: 0-684-83174-0
Page Count: 496
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1999
Share your opinion of this book
More by Edward Humes
BOOK REVIEW
by Edward Humes
BOOK REVIEW
by Edward Humes
BOOK REVIEW
by Edward Humes
by Cyril Wecht with Mark Curriden with Benjamin Wecht ‧ RELEASE DATE: Oct. 21, 1996
Wecht, a forensic pathologist and lawyer (Cause of Death, 1993), provides disappointingly little insight into some sensational trials and tragedies of recent years. Wecht is often called in as an expert when local coroners have trouble establishing a cause of death or when attorneys need a fresh take on the record of an autopsy. But rather than concentrate on the interpretive abilities that have made him professionally so well known, Wecht includes a curious amount of padding here and even, in one chapter, offers transcripts of television interviews he gave on a case. Equally disappointing is his approach to some of the famous cases on which he's been consulted. Wecht provides page after page of gelatinous information about the Simpson case, including much rehashing of familiar material; along the way, he shares his personal beliefs about the Holocaust and offers an apologia for Johnny Cochran's use of bodyguards supplied by the Nation of Islam. As for forensic insight, he states two ``startling truths'': O.J. may have done it, and the police may have planted evidence. As for the deaths of David Koresh and his followers in Waco, the murder of Black Panther Fred Hampton by Chicago police in 1969, the mysterious death of White House counsel Vincent Foster (it was, Wecht decides, a suicide), and the Beverly Hills Supper Club fire in Kentucky in 1977, in which over one hundred people died—the author's takes frequently seem terse or incomplete, rough drafts for a memoir rather than detailed records of investigations or explanations of forensic science. He concludes with a curiously indecisive take on the so-called ``alien autopsy'' film screened on television last year. A sloppy, dissatisfying work from an author who has done better. (8 pages b&w photos, not seen)
Pub Date: Oct. 21, 1996
ISBN: 0-525-93974-1
Page Count: 288
Publisher: Dutton
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1996
Share your opinion of this book
More by Cyril Wecht
BOOK REVIEW
by Cyril Wecht with Mark Curriden with Benjamin Wecht
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hey there, book lover.
We’re glad you found a book that interests you!
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Don’t fret. We’ll find you.