Next book

MOM'S DIARY

THE FIRST TWO YEARS

A sweet, unabashedly sentimental work.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

An illustrated love letter to motherhood during a child’s earliest years.

Kim’s slim debut consists of a series of one-page, four-panel cartoons depicting dozens of key parenting moments. Some hinge on the stark and often hilarious realities of a toddler’s unruly biology (passing gas and spitting up each make more than one appearance). But far more of them center on subtler issues of psychology and personality, often in ways that will have parents of little kids nodding in recognition. Whether it’s a child’s sudden fascination with cleaning things or his need to be near his mother at all times (“He just wanted my company”) or unpredictable changes in his attention level, Kim portrays it with immense sympathy and good-natured humor. Her drawings are simple to the point of being crude, but they’re never confusing or ambiguous, and the childlike nature of the linework feels oddly appropriate to the subject matter. The book’s two overarching motifs are the utter, loving exhaustion that parents of young children inevitably experience and the infinite flexibility that characterizes good parenting. (There’s also the unspoken assumption that kids are incredibly, relentlessly, almost apocalyptically messy.) Kim’s reflections about how fast children grow up are universal, but she also works in a few slightly more idiosyncratic ideas, as when she depicts a child hugging a departing mother as being like plugging in a device to charge its batteries. There’s little in the way of specific instruction in these pages apart from things that most parents already know, such as the importance of encouraging good behavior and constructively discouraging bad behavior. But it will let those parents know that they’re not alone.

A sweet, unabashedly sentimental work.

Pub Date: Aug. 16, 2017

ISBN: 978-1-5127-9198-3

Page Count: 82

Publisher: Westbow Press

Review Posted Online: Dec. 28, 2017

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2018

Categories:
Next book

THEY CAN'T KILL US UNTIL THEY KILL US

Erudite writing from an author struggling to find meaning through music.

An Ohio-based poet, columnist, and music critic takes the pulse of the nation while absorbing some of today’s most eclectic beats.

At first glance, discovering deep meaning in the performance of top-40 songstress Carly Rae Jepsen might seem like a tough assignment. However, Abdurraqib (The Crown Ain’t Worth Much, 2016) does more than just manage it; he dives in fully, uncovering aspects of love and adoration that are as illuminating and earnest as they are powerful and profound. If he can do that with Jepsen's pop, imagine what the likes of Bruce Springsteen, Prince, or Nina Simone might stir in him. But as iconic as those artists may be, the subjects found in these essays often serve to invoke deeper forays into the worlds surrounding the artists as much as the artists themselves. Although the author is interested in the success and appeal of The Weeknd or Chance the Rapper, he is also equally—if not more—intrigued with the sociopolitical and existential issues that they each managed to evoke in present-day America. In witnessing Zoe Saldana’s 2016 portrayal of Simone, for instance, Abdurraqib thinks back to his own childhood playing on the floor of his family home absorbing the powerful emotions caused by his mother’s 1964 recording of “Nina Simone in Concert”—and remembering the relentlessly stigmatized soul who, unlike Saldana, could not wash off her blackness at the end of the day. In listening to Springsteen, the author is reminded of the death of Michael Brown and how “the idea of hard, beautiful, romantic work is a dream sold a lot easier by someone who currently knows where their next meal is coming from.” In all of Abdurraqib’s poetic essays, there is the artist, the work, the nation, and himself. The author effortlessly navigates among these many points before ultimately arriving at conclusions that are sometimes hopeful, often sorrowful, and always visceral.

Erudite writing from an author struggling to find meaning through music.

Pub Date: Nov. 14, 2017

ISBN: 978-1-937512-65-1

Page Count: 288

Publisher: Two Dollar Radio

Review Posted Online: Oct. 1, 2017

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2017

Categories:
Next book

THIS IS SHAKESPEARE

A brief but sometimes knotty and earnest set of studies best suited for Shakespeare enthusiasts.

A brisk study of 20 of the Bard’s plays, focused on stripping off four centuries of overcooked analysis and tangled reinterpretations.

“I don’t really care what he might have meant, nor should you,” writes Smith (Shakespeare Studies/Oxford Univ.; Shakespeare’s First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book, 2016, etc.) in the introduction to this collection. Noting the “gappy” quality of many of his plays—i.e., the dearth of stage directions, the odd tonal and plot twists—the author strives to fill those gaps not with psychological analyses but rather historical context for the ambiguities. She’s less concerned, for instance, with whether Hamlet represents the first flower of the modern mind and instead keys into how the melancholy Dane and his father share a name, making it a study of “cumulative nostalgia” and our difficulty in escaping our pasts. Falstaff’s repeated appearances in multiple plays speak to Shakespeare’s crowd-pleasing tendencies. A Midsummer Night’s Dream is a bawdier and darker exploration of marriage than its teen-friendly interpretations suggest. Smith’s strict-constructionist analyses of the plays can be illuminating: Her understanding of British mores and theater culture in the Elizabethan era explains why Richard III only half-heartedly abandons its charismatic title character, and she is insightful in her discussion of how Twelfth Night labors to return to heterosexual convention after introducing a host of queer tropes. Smith's Shakespeare is eminently fallible, collaborative, and innovative, deliberately warping play structures and then sorting out how much he needs to un-warp them. Yet the book is neither scholarly nor as patiently introductory as works by experts like Stephen Greenblatt. Attempts to goose the language with hipper references—Much Ado About Nothing highlights the “ ‘bros before hoes’ ethic of the military,” and Falstaff is likened to Homer Simpson—mostly fall flat.

A brief but sometimes knotty and earnest set of studies best suited for Shakespeare enthusiasts.

Pub Date: April 21, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-5247-4854-8

Page Count: 368

Publisher: Pantheon

Review Posted Online: Dec. 17, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2020

Categories:
Close Quickview