Next book

EXTREMES

REFLECTIONS ON HUMAN BEHAVIOR

A kind of history of the heart by Dutch cardiologist Dunning, who takes us on a doctor's literary tour of that organ in extreme states. Some of Dunning's tyings together of humanity's involvement with the heart seem forced dilations that allow him to pour and mix his rich research at will. But chapter after chapter holds its own and gathers us into a state of mystical realism. One could hardly expect to find a tie between the burning of Joan of Arc and the hanging of sexual pervert and mass-murderer Gilles de Rais, who were contemporaries. But Joan's heart, it is said by one chronicler, survived her burning, and Gilles's heart was extracted before his hung corpse was placed upon a funeral pyre. Both pyres, Dunning says, ``flare up briefly in the darkness of the Middle Ages [and] represent the outer limits of human conduct.'' We follow the birth of the adoration of the Sacred Heart of Jesus through its origins with the French nun Marguerite Marie Alacoque, a religious anorexic who saw Jesus place her heart in his own empty chest— which Dunning ties in with medical investigations of heart disease and heart transplants. His exploration of the diseased heart of Gustav Mahler—weak with streptococcal bacteria—gives Dunning his richest chapter, as he relates Mahler's compositions, his strained love life with Alma Mahler (half his age), and his visit to Freud for an analysis that revealed the source of Mahler's neurotic suffering as an artist: His most sublime melodies were forever being invaded by banal street tunes, a fact that Freud traced back to Mahler's childhood, his abused mother, and a street organ playing ``Ach, du lieber Augustin.'' Also discussed: Rembrandt's The Anatomy Lesson, Baudelaire's artificial paradise in absinthe, cannibalism in Poe, and much more. A brilliant unpacking of an extremely overfilled mind.

Pub Date: Sept. 1, 1992

ISBN: 0-15-129476-3

Page Count: 224

Publisher: Harcourt

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 1992

Next book

THE QUEST FOR COSMIC JUSTICE

A cosmic straw man is vanquished in the fight against dangerous ideals such as social justice and equality. This is not the place to look for original ideas or honest analysis. Presumably, Sowell’s (Migrations and Cultures, 1996, etc.) goal is to entertain those who share his convictions rather than convince open-minded readers, and this audience will be pleased. “Cosmic justice” is presented as a fundamental departure from the “traditional” conception of justice, which Sowell claims has the “characteristic of a process,” rather than of a particular outcome. He conveniently forgets to mention that this “tradition” dates back only to the emergence of liberal-democratic states and that contrasting notions of procedural vs. substantive justice remain the subject of lively debate. Admitting legitimate disagreement over even something as slippery as justice would soften the blows he aims at those who think inequality and any associated oppression raises concerns a just society should address, and Sowell is not one to temper a political argument simply to maintain intellectual integrity. He is not straightforwardly defending inequality, of course, but rather is pursuing the familiar strategy of attacking measures that could alleviate it. Sowell, a fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford, boldly asserts that those who believe equality should be pursued through public policy “assume that politicizing inequality is free of costs and dangers.” No names are mentioned, and it is indeed hard to imagine that anyone would believe there are no costs or dangers. By stating the issue in terms of extremes, however, he ducks the real issue—the challenge of weighing costs and benefits—and avoids the need for incorporating any subtlety into his discussion. Confronted with such disingenuous blather, readers may find Sowell’s criticism of others applies well to Sowell himself: “To explain the levels of dogmatism and resistance to facts found in too many writings . . . it is necessary to explore what purposes are served by these visions.”

Pub Date: Oct. 1, 1999

ISBN: 0-684-86462-2

Page Count: 224

Publisher: Free Press

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1999

Next book

WHO STOLE THE AMERICAN DREAM?

Not flawless, but one of the best recent analyses of the contemporary woes of American economics and politics.

Remarkably comprehensive and coherent analysis of and prescriptions for America’s contemporary economic malaise by Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Smith (Rethinking America, 1995, etc.).

“Over the past three decades,” writes the author, “we have become Two Americas.” We have arrived at a new Gilded Age, where “gross inequality of income and wealth” have become endemic. Such inequality is not simply the result of “impersonal and irresistible market forces,” but of quite deliberate corporate strategies and the public policies that enabled them. Smith sets out on a mission to trace the history of these strategies and policies, which transformed America from a roughly fair society to its current status as a plutocracy. He leaves few stones unturned. CEO culture has moved since the 1970s from a concern for the general well-being of society, including employees, to the single-minded pursuit of personal enrichment and short-term increases in stock prices. During much of the ’70s, CEO pay was roughly 40 times a worker’s pay; today that number is 367. Whether it be through outsourcing and factory closings, corporate reneging on once-promised contributions to employee health and retirement funds, the deregulation of Wall Street and the financial markets, a tax code which favors overwhelmingly the interests of corporate heads and the superrich—all of which Smith examines in fascinating detail—the American middle class has been left floundering. For its part, government has simply become an enabler and partner of the rich, as the rich have turned wealth into political influence and rigid conservative opposition has created the politics of gridlock. What, then, is to be done? Here, Smith’s brilliant analyses turn tepid, as he advocates for “a peaceful political revolution at the grassroots” to realign the priorities of government and the economy but offers only the vaguest of clues as to how this might occur.

Not flawless, but one of the best recent analyses of the contemporary woes of American economics and politics.

Pub Date: Sept. 11, 2012

ISBN: 978-1-4000-6966-8

Page Count: 576

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: July 16, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2012

Close Quickview