A timely but sometimes overly sentimental anthology of dissident voices.



A diverse group of writers and activists responds to the election of Donald Trump.

The last few months have been a trying time—to say the least—for many Americans, who reacted to the 2016 presidential election with outrage, fear, and, finally, dissent. This new anthology of dissident writers, edited by novelist De Robertis (The Gods of Tango, 2015, etc.), who spent years working for nonprofit organizations, provides some comfort, direction, and inspiration to that large segment of our population. The editor curates a “symphony of voices” of various genders, sexualities, and religions from “communities with roots all over the world.” Contributors include noted authors Junot Díaz, Jane Smiley, Celeste Ng, and Viet Thanh Nguyen as well as writers/activists like Alicia Garza, co-founder of Black Lives Matter, and many others. The pieces take the form of love letters because, as the editor explains, “[James] Baldwin showed us that letter-essays, as a form, are perfectly suited to blend incisive political thought with intimate reflections, to fold them into a single embrace.” Some of the letters are written to specific people (the writers’ children or ancestors), while others take a wider view (“Dear Millennials,” Aya de León begins). Many readers will doubtless find solace in the volume, but there is a sort of sameness to the entries, perhaps due to the required form, and a tearfulness to many of them that becomes tiresome. Unfortunately, not all the writers are immune from cliché (“keep your chin up”). However, there are plenty of strong pieces here, particularly from Francisco Goldman and Katie Kitamura. Kitamura describes both the impossibility and the absolute necessity of language in times like these: “I listen, and I read, and I listen, and still I cannot comprehend the world that is being described.” Still, we go on trying. Other contributors include Roxana Robinson, Hari Kunzru, Jane Smiley, and Claire Messud.

A timely but sometimes overly sentimental anthology of dissident voices.

Pub Date: May 2, 2017

ISBN: 978-0-525-43513-6

Page Count: 272

Publisher: Vintage

Review Posted Online: May 3, 2017

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...

Reader Votes

  • Readers Vote
  • 14

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Google Rating

  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • Kirkus Reviews'
    Best Books Of 2016

  • New York Times Bestseller

  • Pulitzer Prize Finalist


A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.

Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.

Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016

ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6

Page Count: 248

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015

Did you like this book?

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.


“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.

It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0

Page Count: 432

Publisher: PublicAffairs

Review Posted Online: Aug. 28, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Did you like this book?