Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Next book

Hit Out

An enjoyable Chicago detective story starring an eight-ball-playing protagonist.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Musial (Break Shot, 2015) returns with another Max Deacon mystery in this novel of crime and pool.

Max works in a Chicago pool hall. The job isn’t glamorous and the clientele is a bit rough, but it allows him plenty of time to practice the game he loves. Max is preparing to enter an eight-ball tournament offering a cash prize and a spot on the national tour when the pool hall becomes the target of an unexpected series of attacks. Someone hurls a brick through the window, followed by a Molotov cocktail. Later, the owner, Dougie, is badly beaten and left to die in the doorway. With his boss in a coma, Max tries to get a grasp of the situation: “Either Dougie or the pool hall, or someone connected to it, was being targeted. I wanted to find out why.” His only clue is the name of Dougie’s girlfriend, Aaliyah, a woman whom everybody seems to know about except for Max. She’s got connections to a drug dealer on the South Side. Though Max is an Army veteran who knows how to handle himself in a fight, he’s cautioned not to be careless in his personal investigation of the case. Max will do anything for a friend, but as the attacks increase in severity, the situation may prove too much for even a shark like him to shoot his way out of. Max certainly fits the genre archetype, though his modern-day greaser ethos—the pool, the Mustang, the occasional Camel cigarette—and the sleazy Chicago setting provide just enough color to give him a distinctive, lived-in quality. His narrative voice strikes a nice balance between irreverence and world-weary sincerity, and Musial exercises restraint in keeping the dialogue more or less believable. The story is small but well-paced and compelling, and while readers end up right where they expect to, fans of the genre will likely relish this iteration. The world of pool (and the city of Chicago) may be one of the last areas of contemporary society where noirish tropes can be sustained without feeling contrived; Max probably has many adventures ahead of him.

An enjoyable Chicago detective story starring an eight-ball-playing protagonist.

Pub Date: N/A

ISBN: N/A

Page Count: -

Publisher: Dog Ear Publisher

Review Posted Online: July 24, 2016

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 533


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 533


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 120


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 120


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview