by David Carradine ‧ RELEASE DATE: Nov. 1, 2006
Absorbing and sweet—inspires a second (or third, or tenth) viewing of Kill Bill.
Kung Fu Caine’s Kill Bill comeback.
Cult actor/icon Carradine’s diary, kept during the making of the Quentin Tarantino magnum opus Kill Bill (split by the studio into two “volumes”), is by turns engrossing, funny and surprisingly moving as it records both the impossibly difficult realities of personal-yet-epic filmmaking and an under-appreciated talent’s return to professional grace. Carradine had languished for years in marginal action pictures until Tarantino’s first choice for the eponymous role in his kung fu/western/exploitation extravaganza dropped out of the project. That actor was Warren Beatty, who suggested Carradine for the part after Tarantino had referred to the ’70s star for the umpteenth time. In an easy, unpretentious prose style that is prone in equal measure to mystical rambling and rueful self-deprecation, Carradine describes arduous martial-arts training sessions (in which he clashed with preeminent fight choreographer Yuen Wu Ping); his admiration for the performances of his co-stars (Uma Thurman and Michael Madsen receive particular praise); the compounded complexities of international moviemaking; and the boundless energy and invention of writer/director Tarantino. The emotional power here emanates from Carradine’s joy in finally being given the opportunity to work at the top of his abilities with quality collaborators in an atmosphere of mutual respect. If Kill Bill did not result in a Travolta-scale career rehabilitation for Carradine, it did give him the role of a lifetime, and the uncertainty he expresses in the diary’s early sections is rendered charmingly poignant by his ultimately brilliant performance. (A quibble: Carradine inexplicably gives far too much space to semi-literate Internet movie maven Harry Knowles’s set reports—Carradine himself seems annoyed by Knowles, so the inclusion of so much of his embarrassing gush is doubly puzzling. Maybe it’s a kung fu thing.)
Absorbing and sweet—inspires a second (or third, or tenth) viewing of Kill Bill.Pub Date: Nov. 1, 2006
ISBN: 0-06-082346-1
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Harper/HarperCollins
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2006
Share your opinion of this book
More by David Carradine
BOOK REVIEW
by E.T.A. Hoffmann ‧ RELEASE DATE: Oct. 28, 1996
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
Share your opinion of this book
More by E.T.A. Hoffmann
BOOK REVIEW
by E.T.A. Hoffmann ; adapted by Natalie Andrewson ; illustrated by Natalie Andrewson
BOOK REVIEW
by E.T.A. Hoffmann & illustrated by Julie Paschkis
by William Strunk & E.B. White ‧ RELEASE DATE: May 15, 1972
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
Share your opinion of this book
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hey there, book lover.
We’re glad you found a book that interests you!
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Don’t fret. We’ll find you.