A refreshing variety of attitudes toward the experience of writing as a woman are inventively presented in this collection of essays by contemporary female poets and writers, whose editor is herself a poet and teacher of writing. Not surprisingly, the Plath/Woolf dichotomy figures most prominently in the collective unconscious of these writers—Plath exemplifying the worst-case scenario when she succumbs to the pressures of family vs. writing by following ``the wrong recipe, the martyr's recipe'' and sticking her head instead of a cake into the oven (as Laura Kalpakian says in ``My Life as a Boy''), while Woolf, discussed by several of the writers here, boosts morale with her revolutionary assertion in A Room of One's Own that talented women should appropriate time and solitude for work as matter-of- factly as do men. Though many of these committed artists suffered long periods of undefined dissatisfaction before they discovered their vocation, and nearly all had to face the primal art vs. family conundrum in their careers, their reactions to gender- associated adversity and their present attitudes toward their work differ radically. Nahid Rachlin (``Would I Have Become a Writer Without My Sister?'') focuses on her mysterious early power to transport her younger sibling into imaginary realities, while Pam Durban (``Layers'') describes the pleasure she takes in writing as ``seeing how much time and space a story can cross.'' Kalpakian brashly declares herself a greater literary hero than, say, Norman Mailer, because she struggles against the demands of single- parenthood to eke out time and psychic space for creative work; Louise Gluck suggests in ``The Education of the Poet'' that perhaps the greatest challenge is ``to separate the shallow from the deep, and to choose the deep.'' Passionate, reflective, and playful—an education for the next generation. (For another collection by women on writing, see Janet Sternburg's The Writer on Her Work, p. 37.)
Pub Date: June 24, 1991
ISBN: 0-929264-91-6
Page Count: 400
Publisher: Longstreet
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 15, 1991
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
