Next book

IMMEASURABLE OUTCOMES

TEACHING SHAKESPEARE IN THE AGE OF THE ALGORITHM

An edifying and inspiring argument for the imperishable value of a liberal education.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Greene offers a spirited defense of a liberal education not reducible to quantitative assessments.

The author, a literary critic and professor emerita at Scripps College, observes that society has lost its faith in the power of liberal education, once understood as the surest path to the “cultivation of the human and the creation of a citizenry capable of democracy.” Greene notes that the institution was once cherished for training students in the responsible stewardship of one’s own freedom. However, the tide of opinion has turned against it in recent years, caricaturing it as feckless navel-gazing; now decision-makers want unambiguously measurable results, usually of the kind that point to economic progress. But quantitative rubrics are incapable of measuring the fundamentally ineffable—including the manifold benefits yielded by an education in the humanities and the magic of a professor’s personal interactions with their students.Instead of “accountability,” an anodyne bureaucratic word that “refers to something that can be calculated, measured, as in a tallying up, keeping score,” Greene prefers to prioritize “responsibility,” a term that implies responsiveness and engagement and suggests the obligations teachers and students have to each other and to themselves. Without such a perspective, those who join the workforce are missing the bigger picture, a point powerfully made by the author: “Checking off boxes gets you doctors who can read numbers on a screen but can’t hear what a patient is saying; architects who fail to imagine how a housing project affects a neighborhood; engineers who fail to ask how a dam affects the population downstream; software makers who have no idea if their program can be used by nonexperts.”

Greene furnishes the reader with a concrete example of the responsibility she prizes by discussing her teaching of Shakespeare (depicted in a “composite of many classes” the author taught over the course of 40 years at Scripps College). Greene convincingly demolishes the benighted obsession with formulaic teaching assessments and astutely limns the nature of the classroom experience, a “relationship, a crisscross of relationships, two-ways, multiple ways, fraught with the complexities that come with a relationship, times ten, times a thousand.” This is the principal virtue of the book: an aversion to approaches that lack nuance or depth; Greene admirably refuses to succumb to the currents of the time. Moreover, her defense of the humanities as a devotion to an endless fascination with all things human is as philosophically rigorous as it is affectingly impassioned. At the crux of that argument is the formidable figure of Shakespeare, the “heart of humanism.” Greene writes, “I came away feeling, that’s what we love about Shakespeare, he makes us feel good about being human. It was a feeling more than a thought, a flash more than a feeling. I don’t know how else to say it, just glad to be a part of it, humanity in all its silliness, splendor, squalor, sordidness, grandeur, outrageousness.” This is an important contribution to today’s education debates and a sterling example of the intellectual virtues it valorizes. An edifying and inspiring argument for the imperishable value of a liberal education.

Pub Date: Jan. 17, 2023

ISBN: 9781421444604

Page Count: 384

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: March 17, 2023

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 86


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 86


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview