McIsaac’s writing may appeal to the Sasquatch believers, but it leaves open-minded nonbelievers with precious few facts to...



Author McIsaac relays stories from the Dene Nation about creatures they call spirits—and he calls pterodactyls—in an updated version of his debut nonfiction work.

“My understanding of spirits is not their understanding of spirits,” McIsaac writes, acknowledging cultural differences between him and native people, even as he takes the elders’ tales as proof the pterodactyl still exists. The so-called devil bird isn’t alone. McIsaac makes a case for the continued existence of several other prehistoric creatures, including the woolly mammoth, and he also argues the case for Sasquatch, dire wolves and dragons. McIsaac takes a lot on faith, and he asks the reader to do the same. While his theories start out clearly labeled as such, he quickly layers on more theories that only work if the reader accepts the first suppositions—and a number of thirdhand accounts—as fact. Suddenly, there are mammoths hiding in caves and pterodactyls that glow in the dark and generate smoke screens. McIsaac’s style comes across more as storytelling than scientific, especially when he assures the reader that “the odds of finding the Plesiosaur are far better than the odds of winning the lottery.” The final chapter diverges into a denunciation of North American society. McIsaac writes, “Woolly mammoths are a magnificent species and a part of our wildlife. The capitalists do not want us to be aware of them.” These tangents detract from the book’s original purpose and might leave skeptics wondering if his agenda involves more than stories about long-extinct wildlife.

McIsaac’s writing may appeal to the Sasquatch believers, but it leaves open-minded nonbelievers with precious few facts to hang their hats on.

Pub Date: Aug. 8, 2012

ISBN: 978-1466950269

Page Count: 184

Publisher: Trafford

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2013

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

A comprehensive and clear analysis of an important relationship.



Chicago Sun-Times political columnist Neal (The Eisenhowers: Reluctant Dynasty, not reviewed) offers a detailed analysis of the 24-year association between Truman and Eisenhower, who worked in concert to safeguard Western democracy after WWII, until a falling-out in 1952.

President Truman and General Eisenhower’s early relationship was based on mutual respect formed soon after FDR’s death, the author asserts. Truman was impressed by Eisenhower’s military success in Europe, and the general admired the new Chief Executive for sanely assuming presidential duties suddenly thrust on him in a time of crisis. This amiability blossomed into a warm and intimate friendship, Neal demonstrates, as Truman entrusted Eisenhower with jobs of increasing responsibility, from military governor of Germany to supreme commander of the newly formed NATO, an internationally critical post. Harry hoped to recruit Ike as his successor on the Democratic presidential ticket, and Neal shows both political parties competing for the allegiance of the immensely popular Eisenhower before his personal beliefs coalesced and he declared himself a Republican. Neal argues that it was not so much Eisenhower’s decision to join the GOP as his willingness to campaign with the infamous Senator Joseph McCarthy that ruptured his bond with Truman. (The Democratic president, who greatly valued loyalty, was particularly appalled that Eisenhower failed to defend his former superior officer, General George C. Marshall, against McCarthy’s vilification.) The 1952 presidential campaign included a cascade of vicious and personal attacks between Truman and Eisenhower that severed their friendship even as the West began to reap the benefits of security guaranteed by NATO, which they had both worked to establish. Neal suggests that this rift ultimately healed a decade later as the two ex-presidents together confronted their mortality and shared legacy on the eve of JFK’s funeral.

A comprehensive and clear analysis of an important relationship.

Pub Date: Sept. 1, 2001

ISBN: 0-689-85355-8

Page Count: 352

Publisher: Scribner

Review Posted Online: May 20, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 2001

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet



O’Brien celebrates 14 prehistoric monsters by presenting each with a modern object or a human, thereby giving readers information about the size of these giants. Dinosaurs, in full-color and full-snarl, dominate the double-page layouts as they frolic and menace an airplane, fire truck, tank, automobile, and assorted people. For every creature, O’Brien provides the name, its meaning, and a brief line of text. Three of the creatures presented are not dinosaurs at all—Quetzalcoatlus, a pterosaur, Phobosuchus, a relative of the crocodiles, and Dinichthys, a bony fish—which the author mentions in the back matter. The illustrations are not drawn to scale, e.g., if Spinosaurus is really 49 feet long, as the text indicates, the car it is shown next to would appear to be 30 feet long. Readers may have to puzzle over a few scenes, but will enjoy browsing through this book, from the dramatic eyeball view of a toothy Tyrannosaurus rex on the cover to the final head-on glare from a Triceratops. (Picture book/nonfiction. 5-9)

Pub Date: April 1, 1999

ISBN: 0-8050-5738-2

Page Count: 32

Publisher: Henry Holt

Review Posted Online: May 20, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 1999

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet