A concise and persuasive indictment of the Electoral College.
A debut political book explores the undemocratic nature of the Electoral College.
Dedicating his volume to “all voters,” Moyer provides readers with “a nonpartisan discussion of how elections for presidential electors work.” In 23 short chapters and in under 130 pages, this work surveys the origins of the Electoral College and the ways in which it has historically served to obfuscate the will of the voters. Much of the book’s focus is on the theoretical implications of the system, including the oft-discussed power imbalance, where small states have disproportionate electoral representation over more populous ones. Some chapters, though, provide enlightening vignettes that, for example, compare United States elections to those in East Germany and explore outlier states like Nebraska and Maine that use a presidential elector districting system. Ultimately, Moyer concludes in his convincing analysis, the Electoral College system represents a “democracy denied,” as it has been utilized in a way that leaves “voters with as few choices as possible to maximize the power of the two major political parties at the expense of voters.” Moreover, not only are third party and independent candidates denied meaningful opportunities, but the ballots also often obscure the fact that most people are not directly voting for a presidential candidate but are instead backing a slate of unknown electors. Accompanied by over three dozen charts, graphs, timelines, and other visual aids, and written in a style that is accessible to average voters who may not be aware of the intricacies of U.S. elections, this book delivers an engaging appraisal. Most useful is its inclusion of sample ballots across American history that demonstrate the ways they were constructed to mislead voters. Ample appendix materials provide additional evidence that complements Moyer’s argument that “we are not having a free and fair election.” And while the volume’s subtitle is a bit misleading, as the work is far from a comprehensive “History of the Electoral College,” it more than succeeds in its goal of presenting readers with a convincing case against the current system.
A concise and persuasive indictment of the Electoral College.Pub Date: N/A
ISBN: 979-8530501685
Page Count: -
Publisher: Independently Published
Review Posted Online: June 23, 2022
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.
Helping liberals get out of their own way.
Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.Pub Date: March 18, 2025
ISBN: 9781668023488
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Avid Reader Press
Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025
BOOK REVIEW
PERSPECTIVES
For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.
Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979
ISBN: 0061965588
Page Count: 772
Publisher: Harper & Row
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
