Is there a deep state? If there is, writes New York Times columnist Stewart (Tangled Webs: How False Statements Are Undermining America: From Martha Stewart to Bernie Madoff, 2011, etc.), then Donald Trump is definitively a member.
James Comey was a good foot soldier for the FBI. Yet, when the 2016 election was heating up, he made one tactical error after another, especially by planting the suggestion that Hillary Clinton had engaged in illicit behavior when using a private server for official emails. We now know that the State Department has exonerated Clinton, but in 2015, the jury was still out. Meanwhile, other actions on the parts of FBI officials were consternating: Andrew McCabe’s wife, for instance, was running for office in Virginia as a Democrat and had received a sizable donation from that party, causing a Republican stalwart to fulminate that it could not be interpreted as “anything other than a down payment to influence the FBI’s criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.” After Trump entered office, Comey presented him with uncomfortable evidence linking him to prostitutes—evidence inconveniently videotaped by Russian intelligence. McCabe was not long in falling himself after suggesting that he knew that Trump had lied about his reasons for firing Comey. This is all well known to anyone who followed matters as they were happening, heavily reported in papers. A value added is that Stewart looks closely at questions surrounding the affair, asking whether Comey’s actions cost Clinton the election and answering that her “decades of obfuscation…led some voters to doubt Clinton’s integrity and truthfulness, including her claims about the emails.” Granted, Comey departed from policy by criticizing her handling of the matter while not recommending charges against her. Was Comey a Trump foe, as Trump so loudly complained? No, for the FBI’s case file concerned not Trump but, initially, four of his associates who proved to have direct ties to Russia—three of whom “ended up being indicted or pleading guilty to crimes.”
Covers ground already chronicled in the memoirs of the principals, to say nothing of the Mueller Report—but still worth a look.