One couldn’t ask for a more knowledgeable guide to the inner workings of the Met.
A thoroughgoing, eyeball-rolling institutional history of the Metropolitan Opera that concentrates on the personalities to pretty much the exclusion of the art, from Fiedler (Arthur Fiedler, 1994), for 15 years the press representative of the Met.
It might not be quite the treacherous world that the author would like to think, but the Metropolitan Opera, from its inception as a breakaway from the Academy of Music, has had its share of turmoil and emotional strife, if no more than is exercised in familial and corporate settings. While it’s fun to read about the richly deserved axing of Maria Callas and Kathleen Battle, appalling to be reminded of the murder of Helen Hagnes, and dreadful to learn that the tenor Richard Versalle’s last words were “You can only live so long,” sung immediately before a heart attack killed him and he plummeted to the stage from a perch atop a towering ladder, the meat-and-potatoes of Fiedler’s work is the functioning of the Met. Strong personalities have ruled both the Met’s artistic and management offices, from Rudolph Bing’s treating the opera as though it were his personal monarchy, to the more tactically politic (while no less power-hungry) role assumed by Joseph Volpe, who rose from the position of master carpenter to become the current general manager. While Fiedler spends less time on the artistic sensibilities at work, she does a fine job explaining the character of the artistic directors, beginning with Toscanini and his snits and appetite for women, through the unrivaled years with James Levine, who reinvigorated the standards, built the repertory, and explored lesser-known operas. And it is gratifying to follow Fiedler as she charts the democratization of opera, transitioning from the turf of boxholders looking for “the ultimate symbol of social triumph,” to the pure joy of opera lovers.
One couldn’t ask for a more knowledgeable guide to the inner workings of the Met.Pub Date: Oct. 30, 2001
ISBN: 0-385-48187-X
Page Count: 416
Publisher: Nan A. Talese
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 2001
BOOK REVIEW
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
