A novel lacking in story and conflict, acting more as a sounding board for anti-American sentiments and political ideals.
A wealthy Sheikh in Saudi Arabia devises a terrorist strategy to attack America internally and circumvent an open military confrontation in the author’s debut novel.
In objection to U.S. presence in the Middle East as well as the country’s abuse of power, Sheikh Saud formulates a strike similar to 9/11. He believes that a singular attack creating mass destruction would have the greatest reverberation. The Sheikh enlists the help of his friend/assistant Mr. Sultan and Russian scientists to produce a prion disease easily transmitted by contaminated insects, which he hopes to unleash upon American scientific and technological facilities and military sites. Regrettably, Abdelrahman seems more invested in his novel’s concept than the narrative. This seems especially true with Sheikh Saud, who the author gives very little background. Consequently, his opposition to America has no real basis and is further trivialized by his frequent contradictions. For example, he claims “no political ambitions” when his entire scheme is predicated on a political agenda. He is critical of U.S. propaganda, while praising the TV only if it “transmit[s] peaceful and informative program[s].” The Sheikh also condemns orchestrated acts of “disinformation” while freely admitting to brainwashing and lying to Sultan to support his plan. The story feels like it’s at a standstill as the Sheikh spends more time considering scenarios and potential obstacles—none of which he ever has to face—perpetually worried of a double-cross that never happens. The author provides some complexity when the Sheikh dreams of two jinn, or spirits with influence over humans, but one offers dubious advice while the other tries to purge the man of his doubts even though there was no indication of uncertainty. Motivation, in fact, doesn’t seem to exist, for Sheikh Saud or any of the characters involved in the conspiracy. The novel works best when the Sheikh isn’t on a soapbox, and the book’s final two sentences are more profound than any preceding passage.
A novel lacking in story and conflict, acting more as a sounding board for anti-American sentiments and political ideals.Pub Date: Nov. 8, 2011
ISBN: 978-1456788414
Page Count: 105
Publisher: AuthorHouse
Review Posted Online: Feb. 20, 2012
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.
Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).
A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.Pub Date: June 16, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine
Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.
A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.
"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Celadon Books
Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
