Next book

YOU'LL DO

A HISTORY OF MARRYING FOR REASONS OTHER THAN LOVE

A fresh, engaging social history.

An exploration of “the instrumental use of marriage.”

Zug, a professor of family law, examines in lively detail the prevalence of “blatantly transactional marriages,” unions entered into because of financial or legal benefits. Drawing on sources including court cases, historical anecdotes, and her own family’s history, she provides ample evidence to show how generations of American men and women have used marriage “to combat racial, gender, and class discrimination,” gain money or status, ensure their parental rights, and even elude criminal prosecution. If “gold-diggers”—Melania Trump is Zug’s most recent example—are obvious participants in this kind of marriage, they are hardly alone. When widows of Revolutionary or Civil War veterans were able to claim a pension, many marriages occurred between needy young women and elderly men. Some individuals married for status, or to share in the power of politically influential families; marriage to nobility was a way “for new-money families” to bypass “old-money” social controls. For some would-be immigrants, “marriage was their only immigration option and, frequently, their only path to safety.” Marrying for a green card, Zug notes, “remains perfectly legal.” The author documents ways that transactional marriages have increased the risk of exploitation and abuse, but she finds, too, that forced marriages at times have protected women, and their children, “from abandonment and destitution.” She looks at the pros and cons of intermarriage. A white man marrying a Native American woman could gain rights to tribal resources; for a Native woman, intermarriage could mean access to valuable government benefits. Because of spousal privilege, some hasty marriages become an effective criminal defense strategy. In revealing the complex consequences of marrying, Zug concludes that marriage, at best, “is a Band-Aid that Americans have used when society is too sexist, too racist, or just too lazy to implement better solutions.”

A fresh, engaging social history.

Pub Date: Jan. 9, 2024

ISBN: 9781586423742

Page Count: 352

Publisher: Steerforth

Review Posted Online: Sept. 28, 2023

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 1, 2023

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 104


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 104


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview