Next book

THE TROPHY HUNTED REDEMPTION

The premise of hunting man for sport remains reliably sordid entertainment.

In this sequel, a human target must escape captivity in a lawless African nation.

Jack Mason is a chiropractor from Wisconsin. His passion for hunting rare animals leads him to the fictional African nation of Amanbai. After bagging a prize kill, however, he finds himself among the hunted on the Homo Sapien Ranch. Left for dead in Rafferty’s (The Trophy Hunted, 2016) previous novel, Jack has now woken up on the edge of the ranch. His hand and shoulder are severely wounded. He tries to get the attention of a train passing the nearby depot, but blood loss keels him over. He later wakes in a pristine white room, hooked up to a heart monitor and handcuffed to a bed. His wounds have been tended by a buxom African nurse named Nyamba, who says, “We need you to get better….We need you to heal.” Jack initially believes he’s been saved. Then the ranch’s top henchman, Monroe, walks in. They want to mend Jack so they can stalk him again. A bonus treatment involves showing him grotesque hunting footage, followed by an IV cocktail designed to induce nausea. Jack’s only hope is that his wife, Ann, is somehow searching for him. In this gruesome sequel, Rafferty once again hammers home the message that trophy killers ruin “the reputations of hunters” who “use, appreciate and harvest all of the animal.” The prose is raw with grisly imagery, starting with the first scene, in which Jack removes an arrow from his hand (“The shaft disappeared, leaving a dark, red hole in the top of his hand, and a stream of blood and bodily goo”). The author brings early levity to the narrative when Jack names the arrowhead Pierce and calls it his friend. Other tones aren’t as successful, like the consistent sexualization of Nyamba (“It didn’t hurt to see that beautiful butt once again”). An over-the-top twist near the end is well executed, though readers may see it coming. The fallout of Jack’s adventure promises a nerve-racking third installment.

The premise of hunting man for sport remains reliably sordid entertainment.

Pub Date: Aug. 31, 2016

ISBN: 978-1-5320-0267-0

Page Count: 156

Publisher: iUniverse

Review Posted Online: March 14, 2017

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 404


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 404


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 84


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 84


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview