Next book

CAPTURE

Domestic drama meets domestic terrorism. As one of the several criminal masterminds puts it, “What is this, a comic book?”

New York D.A. Butch Karp and his cast of regulars continue their inflationary spiral in a tale that combines a trial for murder with an attempt to thwart yet another terrorist plot.

All the evidence shows that after luring Gail Perez up to his penthouse hotel room with the promise of a juicy role, Broadway producer F. Lloyd Maplethorpe shot her to death when she didn’t come up with a quid pro quo. But all the evidence wasn’t enough for ADA Stewart Reed to convict Maplethorpe the first time around. Shortly after a meeting in which he urges Stewbie to adopt a less-is-more prosecution, Butch learns that his colleague has hanged himself—unless of course he had help—and decides to retry the case himself. Maybe it’ll keep his mind off the quadrilateral duel among Andrew Kane, the sociopathic terrorist risen from the grave to plan a fiendish new strike on New York City; David Grale, the equally indestructible lunatic who rules the Big Apple’s sewer system; the Sons of Man, a cadre of well-heeled right-wing zealots determined to seize unprecedented constitutional powers by blaming Iran for the impending outrage; and the ragtag counterterrorists, including Karp’s daughter Lucy, under the direction of FBI agent S.P. Jaxon. On the one side is the world’s simplest criminal proceeding, on the other an epic stew of double agents, double-crosses and slam-bang action, with the fate of the free world hanging in the balance. Tanenbaum cuts back and forth between the two stories as if they were equally weighty—and in a way they are, because each one is headed toward an absolutely forgone conclusion. “Are we stuck on this counterterrorism carrousel the rest of our lives?” wonders Lucy. Apparently so, since her author isn’t willing to write finis to any of the continuing plotlines that have increasingly encrusted his recent work (Fury, 2005, etc.).

Domestic drama meets domestic terrorism. As one of the several criminal masterminds puts it, “What is this, a comic book?”

Pub Date: June 1, 2009

ISBN: 978-1-4391-4860-0

Page Count: 438

Publisher: Pocket

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 15, 2009

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 331


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 331


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 57


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 57


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview