Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Next book

Alpha Black

A great deal more talking than action but an undeniably smart, tech-laden story.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

In this debut techno-thriller, the National Security Agency tries whatever means necessary to take control of advanced technology from a company it perceives as a threat.

The NSA, always looking to hire the nation’s pre-eminent minds, has noticed a disturbing trend over the last couple of years. Probable recruits seem to be disappearing, the NSA assuming they’ve been covertly working for someone else. Sure enough, agents manage to track one scientist’s phone call, putting him squarely in the vicinity of Traegart Industries in Seattle. Attempting to peek behind Traegart’s firewall gets the NSA a return hack from the company so quick and efficient that Dr. Ari Bannergee surmises it has a quantum computer. After Schar Bonderain proves an exceptional job applicant, scheming NSA Assistant Director Kalman Hajeet calls her into his office. He threatens her family and uses a mind-control drug to coerce her into joining Traegart and gathering intelligence for the agency—and then proceeds to rape her. Dalton Traegart, meanwhile, searches for a fellow Cal Tech student he knew by the nickname of Roshi. He believes Roshi’s capable of tapping into the full human potential, perhaps delving into the unused 90 percent part of the brain, a prospect which may entail sending Roshi into orbit. Both Dalton and Schar, however, will soon realize that Hajeet is not their only enemy. The author ignites an intriguing espionage plot with Schar as a “psychoactive agent” having no choice but to do Hajeet’s bidding. Hajeet’s villainy, too, is without question; his rape of Schar is both malicious and meticulous. But as Dalton and Schar grow closer via their superior intellects, the story’s looming danger dissipates. This is due primarily to Dalton, whose vast wealth and resources make him a bit too formidable. Sharp’s writing is confident and perceptive. Later chapters give way to lengthy discussions that are purely theoretical but boast a nice sci-fi touch. Roshi, for example, may have acquired so much knowledge that he’s predicting future events. The ending leaves a fair amount unresolved, but there are plenty of avenues for Sharp to explore in the proposed sequel.

A great deal more talking than action but an undeniably smart, tech-laden story.

Pub Date: N/A

ISBN: N/A

Page Count: -

Publisher: Dog Ear

Review Posted Online: May 9, 2016

Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 1, 2016

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 667


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 667


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 197


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 197


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview