by Robert Stayton ‧ RELEASE DATE: Sept. 17, 2019
A thoughtful approach to widespread solar energy that omits some practicalities but delivers a realistic vision of a better...
Awards & Accolades
Our Verdict
GET IT
A writer offers a proposal for combating both climate change and economic inequality through solar energy.
Stayton (Power Shift, 2015) presents an aspirational guide to saving the world through the extensive adoption of solar power and other forms of renewable energy combined with automatic dividend payments. The dividends would convert the profits from the sale of energy into an unconditional basic income. The enthusiastic book is divided into two parts. The first section is written from the perspective of a person in the year 2099 explaining how the solar-driven system has transformed the world. The second returns to the present to examine how the strategy could be implemented. The 2099 narrator, who is not named, reveals that “my parents…took the extra step of registering me for my standard solar energy array” at birth. The narrator then explains the mechanics of being entitled to a lifetime of monthly payments from the earnings of a cooperatively managed array. The disbursements make government welfare programs unnecessary; the solar panels spark economic expansion (“Solar acts like a local oil well for generating growth”); everyone is more physically and financially secure; and carbon emissions drop substantially. After exploring the future, the author provides a detailed and comprehensive framework for the political, technological, and practical changes necessary to make the solar regime feasible, from infrared-opaque panels that allow arrays to work on farmland to the cooperatives that manage and maintain the equipment and distribute the dividends. Although the book’s premise is utopian, Stayton supplies a painstaking and largely plausible road map for achieving it. In this plan, the increased costs of fossil fuels make higher-priced solar energy viable. The “solar profit margin” is a panacea, and the author explains how its cyclical impacts become self-sustaining once they have been established. The question of how to attain the structural changes necessary to create a solar energy system (“We can accomplish all this without Draconian laws, massive ‘moonshot’ tax expenditures, political movements, or revolution”) is largely glossed over. (“Step 1: convince government bodies that regulate utility rates to establish a high buy-back price”; “That change requires political will to overcome the resistance from vested interests and conventional economists who insist that energy prices must remain low.”) While this is an understandable omission, it is also the volume’s one substantial weakness. But aside from that, the book is thorough in elucidating both the logic and mechanics of the system, with a substantial and well-researched discussion of basic incomes and a compelling argument in favor of higher energy prices (“Since low energy prices are holding back the transition to clean energy, it’s time to reexamine that conventional wisdom”). In addition, Stayton includes an appendix that dives into the numbers in order to prove that the system is physically possible and economically effective (“If we can get 25% of our energy from wind and hydropower, and if we install about 10 kilowatts of PV panels for each person on the planet, then we can meet all of our adjusted energy needs in the future”).
A thoughtful approach to widespread solar energy that omits some practicalities but delivers a realistic vision of a better world.Pub Date: Sept. 17, 2019
ISBN: 978-0-9904792-3-9
Page Count: 124
Publisher: Sandstone Publishing
Review Posted Online: June 21, 2019
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
Share your opinion of this book
by William Strunk & E.B. White ‧ RELEASE DATE: May 15, 1972
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
Share your opinion of this book
by Emma Smith ‧ RELEASE DATE: April 21, 2020
A brief but sometimes knotty and earnest set of studies best suited for Shakespeare enthusiasts.
A brisk study of 20 of the Bard’s plays, focused on stripping off four centuries of overcooked analysis and tangled reinterpretations.
“I don’t really care what he might have meant, nor should you,” writes Smith (Shakespeare Studies/Oxford Univ.; Shakespeare’s First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book, 2016, etc.) in the introduction to this collection. Noting the “gappy” quality of many of his plays—i.e., the dearth of stage directions, the odd tonal and plot twists—the author strives to fill those gaps not with psychological analyses but rather historical context for the ambiguities. She’s less concerned, for instance, with whether Hamlet represents the first flower of the modern mind and instead keys into how the melancholy Dane and his father share a name, making it a study of “cumulative nostalgia” and our difficulty in escaping our pasts. Falstaff’s repeated appearances in multiple plays speak to Shakespeare’s crowd-pleasing tendencies. A Midsummer Night’s Dream is a bawdier and darker exploration of marriage than its teen-friendly interpretations suggest. Smith’s strict-constructionist analyses of the plays can be illuminating: Her understanding of British mores and theater culture in the Elizabethan era explains why Richard III only half-heartedly abandons its charismatic title character, and she is insightful in her discussion of how Twelfth Night labors to return to heterosexual convention after introducing a host of queer tropes. Smith's Shakespeare is eminently fallible, collaborative, and innovative, deliberately warping play structures and then sorting out how much he needs to un-warp them. Yet the book is neither scholarly nor as patiently introductory as works by experts like Stephen Greenblatt. Attempts to goose the language with hipper references—Much Ado About Nothing highlights the “ ‘bros before hoes’ ethic of the military,” and Falstaff is likened to Homer Simpson—mostly fall flat.
A brief but sometimes knotty and earnest set of studies best suited for Shakespeare enthusiasts.Pub Date: April 21, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-5247-4854-8
Page Count: 368
Publisher: Pantheon
Review Posted Online: Dec. 17, 2019
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2020
Share your opinion of this book
More by Emma Smith
BOOK REVIEW
by Emma Smith
BOOK REVIEW
by Emma Smith
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hey there, book lover.
We’re glad you found a book that interests you!
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Trouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Don’t fret. We’ll find you.