Next book

THE FOURTH WOMAN

A sometimes-frustrating but often compelling dark thriller.

In Teukolsky’s novel, a woman uses the power of technology to fight back against a stalker who’s embedded himself in her life in more ways than one.

Boston-based cybersecurity expert Madeline Geiger is getting ready for a night out when a cyberattacker attempts to lock her out of her computer with ransomware. She shifts to attack mode herself, tracking down the hacker and hitting where it hurts by causing the unknown attacker’s computer to melt. Her first date with neuroscientist Vincent Cantley is rescheduled for the next night at a bar, where she’s turned off by his descriptions of his brainwave experiments on rats: “Using complicated hand gestures, he describes his experiments with mice and rats, starting with tiny lights implanted in their heads.” She agrees to a second date, though, involving dinner and a visit to his lab. Things quickly go south when she learns more about his experiments; later, she repeatedly reports Vince’s increasingly creepy behavior to the police, who do nothing—leaving it up to her to deal with his disturbing pursuit. Madeline is a compelling narrator with the tech savvy of Stieg Larsson’s Lisbeth Salander and the brassy audacity of Sara Paretsky’s V.I. Warshawski. Her clear, assertive intelligence, however, makes some of her interactions with the other characters confusing. She’s desperately worried for her mother, for example, who has Alzheimer’s disease, but leaves her home alone and unsupervised. She later keeps the mysterious Gretchen Auerbach on as her mom’s caretaker, even after an incident in which her charge escapes the house. Madeline also seems unable to extricate herself from a relationship with Vince, whom she loathes, which causes the story to sag in the middle. Still, Madeline is a tenacious character, and readers will be on her side as the plot encompasses a network of incels, and only her female friends seem willing or able to help her. The narrative’s psychological games become maddening, and the truth behind Vince’s pursuit of Madeline is upsetting, but Madeline’s investigation results in a satisfying payoff.

A sometimes-frustrating but often compelling dark thriller.

Pub Date: Dec. 8, 2025

ISBN: 9781967036035

Page Count: 365

Publisher: Self

Review Posted Online: Dec. 24, 2025

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 534


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 534


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 120


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 120


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview