Next book

THE POWER LAW

VENTURE CAPITAL AND THE MAKING OF THE NEW FUTURE

Though it plods in spots, as forays into economics will, financial wonks will find it indispensable.

British financial journalist Mallaby delivers a circumstantial portrait of the venture capital revolution, with all its ups and downs.

How does one go about getting a hand into the pot of gold that is the venture capital market? By convincing investors that the power law is in play—i.e., that a specific idea will scale up “at an accelerating, exponential rate,” yielding riches for a relatively modest stake. For the maker of that idea, one has to hit on something that the world doesn’t know it needs until it does. In this highly detailed and sometimes wearisome account, the author opens with one such idea: An inventor conceives an all-plant hamburger that smells and tastes like meat, approaches a venture capitalist with the promise “to make you even more insanely rich than you already are,” and voilà: Impossible Foods was born. Mallaby, a former contributing editor at the Financial Times, locates the first venture capital funds in Silicon Valley but from a renegade source: In 1957, a group of scientists walked away from a lab and founded a group that was first known by the longer name “adventure capital.” The author traces the evolution of venture capital into the 1970s post-hippie culture of the Bay Area, where former communards were now content with the thought of becoming insanely rich, their tinkerings soon to explode in the digital revolution. By anticipating the wave, funders grew rich indeed, “making Silicon Valley the most durably productive crucible of applied science anywhere, ever.” Tracing the tumultuous rise of PayPal, Facebook, and other venture-funded projects, Mallaby reveals some of the inner tensions inherent in the game: Founders can be free spirits, but funders demand that they be controlled by outer boards and CEOs. The author closes with a projection into the future, with funders scattered well beyond Silicon Valley while fighting a long and perhaps losing war with an aggressive Chinese fund culture.

Though it plods in spots, as forays into economics will, financial wonks will find it indispensable.

Pub Date: Jan. 25, 2022

ISBN: 978-0-525-55999-3

Page Count: 496

Publisher: Penguin Press

Review Posted Online: Nov. 12, 2021

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Dec. 1, 2021

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 213


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 213


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

THINKING, FAST AND SLOW

Striking research showing the immense complexity of ordinary thought and revealing the identities of the gatekeepers in our...

A psychologist and Nobel Prize winner summarizes and synthesizes the recent decades of research on intuition and systematic thinking.

The author of several scholarly texts, Kahneman (Emeritus Psychology and Public Affairs/Princeton Univ.) now offers general readers not just the findings of psychological research but also a better understanding of how research questions arise and how scholars systematically frame and answer them. He begins with the distinction between System 1 and System 2 mental operations, the former referring to quick, automatic thought, the latter to more effortful, overt thinking. We rely heavily, writes, on System 1, resorting to the higher-energy System 2 only when we need or want to. Kahneman continually refers to System 2 as “lazy”: We don’t want to think rigorously about something. The author then explores the nuances of our two-system minds, showing how they perform in various situations. Psychological experiments have repeatedly revealed that our intuitions are generally wrong, that our assessments are based on biases and that our System 1 hates doubt and despises ambiguity. Kahneman largely avoids jargon; when he does use some (“heuristics,” for example), he argues that such terms really ought to join our everyday vocabulary. He reviews many fundamental concepts in psychology and statistics (regression to the mean, the narrative fallacy, the optimistic bias), showing how they relate to his overall concerns about how we think and why we make the decisions that we do. Some of the later chapters (dealing with risk-taking and statistics and probabilities) are denser than others (some readers may resent such demands on System 2!), but the passages that deal with the economic and political implications of the research are gripping.

Striking research showing the immense complexity of ordinary thought and revealing the identities of the gatekeepers in our minds.

Pub Date: Nov. 1, 2011

ISBN: 978-0-374-27563-1

Page Count: 512

Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Review Posted Online: Sept. 3, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2011

Close Quickview