A fine addition to the genre: Giegerich has worked hard researching the subject, and he writes without cynicism.
Accounts following students through medical school appear regularly, but this one limits itself to a single course: first-year anatomy. It turns out to be a good idea.
Giegerich takes a journalist’s approach, emphasizing the human interest of his story. Choosing one cadaver, he researches its life and writes the biography of the man from birth through education, marriage, career, illness, and death. He tells the life story of the mortician at the New Jersey medical school who prepares the body for dissection, of the instructors who teach, and of a researcher who studies how students deal with the stress of anatomy class. Finally, the author focuses on four medical students, who make an appealing collection of aspiring doctors, and adds their life stories to that of the man they dissect. To meet and cut into a dead human marks the baptism by fire for every medical student. The author describes the reaction of each of the four, then follows them for three-and-a-half months as they reduce the cadaver to shreds. We see them struggle, then succeed in absorbing a massive amount of information and grow increasingly confident in their ability to make it through four years. Readers will be pleased to learn that the experience does not harden the students, but increases their respect for the human body and their commitment to their profession. The narrative rings true despite the usual tendency of lay writers to emphasize the bad smells and gruesome sights of anatomy lab, as well as the often-horrified reactions, internal struggles, and philosophizing of the students. In reality, such introspection takes up little of a medical student’s time.
A fine addition to the genre: Giegerich has worked hard researching the subject, and he writes without cynicism.Pub Date: Aug. 1, 2001
ISBN: 0-684-86207-7
Page Count: 256
Publisher: Scribner
Review Posted Online: June 24, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2001
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
